Texas synagogue jihadi’s UK community hopes Allah will ‘bless him with the highest ranks of Paradise’ By Daniel Greenfield
Tuesday, January 18, 2022
Jihad Watch : Daniel
Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an
investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and
As far back as 2013, Pakistani Muslim terrorists had plotted to take
“foreign Jews” hostage to trade for ‘Lady Al Qaeda’. In 2022, a
Pakistani Muslim terrorist actually went out and did it.
The hostage crisis at Congregation Beth Israel, a Reform Temple in
Texas, ended with Faisal Akram of Blackburn, another post-industrial
English town where Muslims make up a third of the population and
Pakistanis account for over 10 percent, dead, and his Jewish hostages
Back home, the Blackburn Muslim Community page announced that “Faisal
Akram has sadly departed from this temporary world” and prayed that
Allah “bless him with the highest ranks of Paradise”.
The BMC page had previously promoted a “charity” event to raise money
for “Palestinians” by the Human Relief Foundation, which had been
banned by Israel over its ties to Hamas.
The town has produced no shortage of Jihadists, including the
youngest terrorist in the UK, as well as a number of Jihadis who
traveled to join ISIS, an associate of shoe bomber Richard Reid, and a
terrorist who played a key role in an Al Qaeda plot that targeted New York and D.C.
Blackburn is one of the most segregated towns in the country and has been described as a “no-go zone”. The area that produced the Temple Terrorist has the highest Muslim population outside of London where some claim that flying the English flag has been effectively outlawed.
The setting couldn’t be any better for the media to whitewash the
murderous terrorist with the familiar excuses that he was the victim of
failed integration in the United Kingdom. His family, in an even more
familiar excuse, is claiming that he “was suffering from mental health
That, along with the claim by FBI Special Agent in Charge Matt
DeSarno that the terrorist, “was singularly focused on one issue, and it
was not specifically related to the Jewish community”, is becoming the
very familiar narrative for covering up the latest Muslim terror attack.
But antisemitism, like Islamism, was part of the air that Faisal Akram breathed in Blackburn.
Salim Mulla, Blackburn’s former mayor and current Labour councilor,
claimed that Israel was behind ISIS and school shootings in America.
Last year, four Muslim men from Blackburn took part in a “Palestinian”
convoy while shouting, “F*** the Jews… F*** all of them. F*** their
mothers, f*** their daughters and show your support for Palestine. Rape
their daughters and we have to send a message like that. Please do it
for the poor children in Gaza.”
Siddiqui aka Lady Al Qaeda, on whose behalf the Texas synagogue
attack took place, was married to the nephew of 9/11 mastermind Khalid
Sheikh Mohammed, and had assorted recipes for mass murder in her
possession when she was captured. Despite graduating from Brandeis, a
formerly Jewish university, she demanded at her trial that jurors
undergo DNA tests to prove that they are not Jewish. And the Aafia
Foundation posted bizarre antisemitic rants about the “degree of
poisonous venum (sic) within the heart of American mainstream jewry”.
The harted of Jews, like the hatred of all non-Muslims, is a crucial motive for Islamic terrorism.
If Blackburn is a miserable place, the tale of the Akram family may
reveal why. The official family statement by the terrorist’s brother,
Gulbar Akram, claims that “although my brother was suffering from mental
health issues we were confident that he would not harm the hostages”
and denied that the FBI had rescued the hostages from being killed by
his brother. “Don’t believe the bull#### in the media they were released
from the fire exit and Not rescued.”
The Blackburn Community message describes the terrorist as having
brothers named “Gulbar”, “Malik” and the “Late Gulzameer Akram”.
Two brothers named Gulbar Akram and Gulzameer Akram in Blackburn had been locked up over stolen cars. Another time, a Blackburn resident named Gulbar Akram almost had his nose sliced off. A Gulzameer Akram ran a massive counterfeiting operation from a Blackburn home. A Malik Akram was locked up for harassing girls. Were all of them members of the same clan?
The best way to cover up a terrorist attack is to shift the context.
And that’s what they’re doing. But it’s important to dig into the true
context to understand the true origins of the Texas attack.
In his book, Among the Mosques, ex-Islamist Ed Husain
described Blackburn as “another global hub for the Deobandis and the
Tableeghi Jamaat” where the mosques pray for the destruction of the
enemies of Islam and texts declare that “there can be no reconciliation
between Islam and democracy”.
The Deobandis, who control many of the mosques in Blackburn, originated the Taliban.
Aafia Siddiqui, better known as ‘Lady Al Qaeda’, is a Deobandi, the
terrorist on whose behalf Faisal Akram took a synagogue hostage, and a
popular cause with Pakistanis. A few years ago the Pakistani Senate had
even named the Islamic terrorist, the “Daughter of the Nation”.
Indian Mujahideen co-founder Riyaz Bhatkal had plotted to take Jews hostage a
decade ago in order to force ‘Lady Al Qaeda’s release. British Muslim
“charities” were a major source of funding to the Jihadist group as they
are for many Pakistani Jihadist enterprises.
While much has been made of the advocacy on behalf of Siddiqui by
CAIR and other Islamist colonists in America, top Muslim politicians in
the UK also vocally demanded her release, including Lord Nazir Ahmed and
Lord Altaf Sheikh.
When Husain visited Blackburn, he warned that, “it is clear that a
caliphist subculture thrives here, a separate world from the rest of
Tableeghi Jamaat, whose mosques are known as “breeding grounds” for Jihad, is closely intertwined with Pakistani Islamism and
vectored Islamic terrorism. Quite a number have joined Al Qaeda. It is
no coincidence that so many Islamic terrorists have come out of
Nor is it a coincidence that the latest Islamic terrorist attack on America originated there.
Faisal Akram traveled to Texas, where ‘Lady Al Qaeda’ sleeps at the
Federal Medical Center, Carswell in Fort Worth. He was one of many
Muslim pilgrims seeking to extricate her. Just last fall, the
Dallas-Forth Worth CAIR and the Pakistani terror regime claimed that
Aafia Siddiqui had been assaulted in U.S. custody in the latest effort
of many on behalf of ‘Lady Al Qaeda’.
Faisal’s target, a progressive Reform Temple which happened to carry
the traditional name of Congregation Beth Israel despite its social
justice activist clergyman’s hostility to Israel, was ideally selected
to fit Muslim antisemitic obsessions with both Israel and Jews.
The antisemitic rants, the hostage crisis, and the rapid cover-up are
all regular features of life for Jews in Europe. Changing demographics
are making them a new reality for American Jews.
Any American city or town can become the new Blackburn. That’s the harsh lesson here.
Pakistani antisemitism and obscure Jihadist movements are not local
issues, they are global threats. The poison nurtured in a declining
British post-industrial town blew up in Texas. We are all
interconnected, and that interconnectedness has made the Jihad into a
global enterprise. Ideas, tactics, and organizations that once took
centuries to colonize the world can travel around it at the speed of the
internet and a terror plot can happen at the speed of a jet plane.
We can either police our borders, control our immigration, and build
walls around our nations, or we must be resigned to being hunted,
stalked, and killed anywhere and at any given moment.
In Blackburn, Muslims anticipate the Texas Jihadist ascending to the
“highest ranks of Paradise” where he will enjoy the company of 72
Is there hope yet for Malaysia? - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Monday, January 17, 2022
Malaysiakini : “The fall of one regime does not bring in a utopia. Rather, it
opens the way for hard work and long efforts to build more just social,
economic and political relationships and the eradication of other forms
of injustices and oppression.” - Gene Sharp, "From Dictatorship to Democracy"
A recently retired diplomat who worked for BN, Pakatan Harapan and
limped along for Perikatan Nasional, posed the question which is the
title of this piece.
We have to ask, who is doing the hoping,
here? When Harapan political operatives talk about how Malaysians voted
for “change” this was not really reflected in who the majority of
Malaysians voted for.
However elections have consequences and the fact that Harapan could
have carried out a reform agenda but chose not to, is now being framed
as Harapan did not have much time or to blame Dr Mahathir Mohamad.
in mind that Harapan political operatives were assuring everyone that
they had methods to restrain the old maverick before the election. But
you know what, and this is the dirty little secret, there were many
Harapan non-Malay political operatives who actually approved of Mahathir
and were sceptical of Anwar Ibrahim.
Harapan framed the
dethroning of Umno/BN as some sort of apocalyptic showdown. When they
were in power, they spent most of the time backtracking on their
campaign promises and gaslighting the people who voted for them that all
was kosher in the coalition.
Harapan blamed the Sheraton Move on
the derailing of the reform agenda but this would only make sense if
they were not walking back on reforms to the lead up to the Sheraton
Move. This would mean the hard work and long efforts that Gene Sharp
(folks should read his books) talks about.
The underlying motive
of the plotters of the Sheraton Move was racial and religious in nature,
in that the DAP was used (again) as the punching bag for Malay
This meant that nobody really believed the New Malaysia
propaganda. Keep in mind that Harapan was not a populist movement which
was reflected in voter share.
When it comes to ketuanan politics, maybe a good voting chunk of the majority do not want to give up their ketuanan status.
wants to give up their special privileges, especially when those
privileges sustain families and communities through the vagaries of a
changing economic and geopolitical landscape.
But the big question is, do the majority of Malaysians want reform? When I say majority I include non-Malays as well.
there any real interest in reforming the system beyond seeing that
Najib Abdul Razak and the court cluster don orange jumpsuits?
does "hope" mean in the context of this specific demographic? Hope that
a political coalition would point out the abuses of Article 153 of the
We know there have been Umno ministers who
said that Malay “rights” to entitlement programmes should remain in
perpetuity and we know that opposition political operatives have no real
agenda to deal with this question, beyond blathering on about
needs-based affirmative action.
Hope that a coalition would save
the majority from the excesses of religion which is enabled by a vast
religious bureaucracy that intrudes into every facet of Malaysian life?
Well, Mujahid Yusof Rawa had no problem justifying the budget that Harapan gave to the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim).
Religion of the state
a religion – any religion – is made the religion of the state, it is,
by very definition, potentially confrontational. Non-Muslims have to
understand then when it comes to Islam in this country, secular rules of
engagement do not apply.
Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi in last year’s annual general assembly promised to “empower” syariah law by changing the Federal Constitution if it got a supermajority.
anyone really think a supermajority is needed? All it needs is a vote
in Parliament and we would have Muslim political operatives (who are
engaged in a protracted political fight in the Malay establishment)
attempting to outdo each other in bragging rights about how they turned
this country into a model Islamic nation or making justifications for
abandoning their non-Malay vote base because this was about the religion
of the state.
Hope that a coalition would support the rhetoric of young Malays like Fadiah Nadwa Fikri who wrote this, and in my piece
about the fascist attack (during Harapan’s tenure), I highlighted the
three questions she posed, which I will reproduce here because they are
damn good questions.
Mengapa golongan yang darahnya merah,
semerah darah mereka yang dipaksakan kepatuhan kepada golongan itu,
mempunyai hak keistimewaan tersendiri?
yang memerah hasil keringat mereka yang bersusah payah berjuang untuk
terus hidup dan mencari kehidupan yang manusiawi perlu diberikan layanan
dan pemujaan persis tuhan?
Mengapa golongan yang
dikurniakan secara mutlak mengikut budi bicara sendirinya kuasa besar
dan kekayaan yang dirampas daripada mereka yang diperhambakan, kebal
Hope that a coalition would seriously want to reform the state security apparatus?
fact that when Harapan was in power, they chose by omission to endorse
the victimhood narrative of the state security apparatus when it comes
to oversight, should tell us everything we need to know about efforts to
reform the police force, not to mention the complete indifference to
Do I think that the majority of Malaysians hate each other? No, I do not think so.
Do I think the majority of Malaysians want a just and equitable system? No, I do not think so.
average rakyat, no matter who they vote for, do not have the animus
against each other that is often in full display on social media or in
the machinations of political operatives.
Do I think that Malaysia needs a real alternative to the system in place? Yes, I do.
And as long as there is no real alternative, there really is no hope for those who want another kind of Malaysia.
Hadi remains an existential threat to Malaysia - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Thursday, January 13, 2022
Wannabe Camel Jockey
Malaysiakini : "PAS ingin bertanya, mengapa kalangan bukan Islam tidak boleh
menerima Islam sebagai penyelesaian masalah dunia, padahal mereka
berjuang untuk menegakkan ideologi kanan dan kiri, sehinggakan ideologi
paling ekstrem yang diciptakan oleh kalangan bukan daripada kaum atau
bangsa malah tidak seagama dengan mereka?"– PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang
COMMENT | Abdul Hadi Awang’s recent rejoinder
of PAS’ commitment to a Malay uber alles government is not merely a
political commitment towards Malaysia’s ethnocratic state of play but
rather a clarion call for believers who understand demographic is
Commander Thaya in the UK
Hadi’s version of Islam is frankly atavistic, the kind of demagoguery that some “Islamic” states are trying to withdraw from.
What makes Hadi so dangerous is not the electoral prospects of PAS.
What makes Hadi so dangerous is not the incompetency of PAS political
operatives on a state or federal level. What makes Hadi so dangerous is
not the biased response of the state when it comes to his provocations.
makes Hadi so dangerous is that his narrative of Islam remains
unchallenged by the political mainstream. Our slowly eroding public and
private spheres is all part of the plan when it comes to turning
Malaysia into an Islamic state.
Think of it this way. Hadi who
used to hold high office in an international Islamic organisation deemed
a terrorist organisation by certain Gulf states, including Saudi
Arabia, is confident enough to claim:
Arab civilisation was respected because of Islam but is now crumbling
under the weight of their own crimes by recognising the Zionist regime
and neglecting Palestine and its rights.
"They are now driven by
their belief and admiration for the Zionist Jewish powers-that-be, more
than to trust in God, Islam and their fellow Muslims."
this means is that religious extremists in Malaysia do not really need
to look for inspiration elsewhere but rather the seeds of what they
believe constitutes a genuine Islamic state has already been planted in
In other words, they have successfully influenced
policy decisions in certain states, slowly shaping them into what PAS
believes is the destiny of Malaysia.
I refer to it as the "balkanisation" of moderation when it comes to the influence of religion on public policy.
of areas in Malaysia where the kind of Islam Hadi advocates does not
have as firm a grip as it does where PAS and their Malay uber alles
allies run riot.
People think it is funny when Hadi claims he does
not understand why non-Muslims do not understand why Islam is the
solution to humanity’s problems.
First off, every religion thinks
it is the solution to humanity's problem, which is ironic because
religion is the cause of most of humanity's problems.
What folk do
not seem to understand is that you can mock Hadi all you want on social
media, but the reality is that he is winning.
His ideas have
seeped into every facet of Malaysian life. The mainstream political
establishment is held hostage by his belief system.
people forget is that Hadi is not posing that question to non-Muslims.
That particular question is aimed at believers who already believe that
Islam is the solution and it is incumbent on them to force the solution
on everyone regardless of religious belief.
Ideas of majoritarian rule and how demographics enable such are themes in an ongoing fascist take over of this country.
Hadi talks of Western ideologies and their effects on mainstream Malay
culture and polity, these are ideas that have been used to justify the
Islamisation of this country.
For instance in March 2017, during a
debate regarding Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965 (Act
355) proposed amendments, lawyer Aidil Khalid argued: “In turn, some (of these laws) are based on the principles of morality from Christian principles.
"Muslims in this country have been subjected to the civil laws, we do not complain."
On the other side opposing the motion were lawyers Ambiga Sreenevasan and Haris Ibrahim.
said that he would not have the Islam he believes in taken away from
him. The tragedy is that his version of Islam is anathema to mainstream
Hadi understands that he will be vilified by
non-Malay political operatives but he also knows that when it comes to
actual policymaking, his rhetoric and that of his base will have a
profound impact, even though politically in terms of representation, PAS
may be negligible especially in the federal government.
separates Hadi from the rest of the Umno-aligned herd is that the PAS
base still believes that they have a shot at truly influencing the
direction of this country.
They do not view what Hadi says as
malicious or bigoted, indeed because of the millions of ringgit spent on
religious schools and governmental propaganda, the kind of Islam PAS
advocates is mainstream.
And it does not matter if PAS does not
win elections, especially in urban areas. Actually, more often than not,
it is a point of pride that they continue hacking away, even though
This is why Hadi gets to dismiss corruption and not suffer any blowback.
Zakir Naik can claim that it is better to vote for corrupt Muslim
leaders than honest non-Muslim leaders, Hadi can certainly propagate the
narrative that Muslim solidarity means never having to be sanctioned
I remember when Pakatan Rakyat had that "PAS for all" propaganda which I was bitterly opposed to.
Who knows, maybe sooner rather than later, PAS for all will become a reality.
Weaponising the refugee issue in Malaysia - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Monday, January 10, 2022
Malaysiakini : “There's no limit to how complicated things can get, on account of one thing always leading to another.” - American writer E B White
COMMENT | Two years back, I got
into trouble with my 'progressive' friends for writing a piece about the
Rohingya issue that was not politically correct. I have not revised my
opinion on the matter.
I reproduce three points from the article
that demonstrate why political operatives and advocacy groups profit
from the Rohingya and refugee issue while further dividing this country.
(1) We should be denying and curtailing the influx of Rohingya into
this country, who for years have been living off the political
machinations of the Malay Muslim political establishment.
was convenient to use these 'economic' migrants for political and
religious purposes, Malay political operatives from both sides of the
divide were using them as examples of the 'injustices' the Muslim
community faced in the world and using them as a rallying cry for local
(2) Of course, there has been no
discussion or accountability of the millions of dollars of aid from
Muslim countries and Western organisations for the benefit of the
Neither has there been accountability
for the numerous Rohingya organisations that claim to advocate for the
community but have been assimilated into various Muslim advocacy groups
in the country.
(3) What we are dealing with is the
economic fallout of decades of political and religious manipulation of
the state and the misguided intentions of non-Malay participants in
creating a powder keg of racial imbalances in the majority Malay
MCA Beliawanis (MCA Young Women's Bureau) chief Ivone Low Yi Wen got some folks' knickers in a twist when she commented on the thug-like behaviour of “refugee children” in a series of online video clips.
Pengerang MP Azalina Othman Said said children should not be blamed when 'the country' failed to protect them.
actually, no, the 'country' did not fail to protect them. The
political apparatus of this country failed to protect them as it has
failed with a great many issues.
Depending on the racial and class
structure of the country, a certain section does not want them here,
another section is using them for political mileage, and another section
probably thinks that open borders are a good thing.
Predictable voices of condemnation
predictable voices of condemnation came from social activist cliques,
paid activists, and the usual assortment of political operatives – who
to be fair to them some have done sterling work on marginalised
communities here in Malaysia.
These voices are just further
perpetuating political narratives that complicate homegrown issues of
race and religion. Both sides are using children to score political
It really does not matter if it is BN, Perikatan
Nasional, or Pakatan Harapan. Each at one time or another, most likely
when out of government, has used refugees, especially Muslim refugees,
as pawns in an effort to discredit the ruling party or attempt to show
how the support of refugees translates to supporting the Malay polity.
this is not only hypocritical but also mendacious as both attempt to
portray the situation as a religious one - when it comes to Muslim
refugees - as opposed to economic or political ones.
Consider the online reception then human resources minister M Kulasegaran received when he reminded the Harapan government of its campaign pledge to allow refugees to work.
and in other places, he was vilified for not looking after “Malaysians
first” and predictably the Harapan government had a rethink on how to
approach this issue.
But this did not stop political operatives – Malay and non-Malay – from pontificating on the “plight” of refugees in Malaysia.
it is, we have enough Malaysians who are having it rough because
successive elected governments are more interested in maintaining power
through race and religion than by actually formulating policies that
would help all Malaysians.
All these Malay uber alles
political operatives are now discovering that decades of religious and
immigration malfeasances have resulted in a polity that is competing
with a host of Muslim migrants in a time of a pandemic.
resentment is slowly bubbling to the top. This is why we have articles
in the foreign media about how once welcomed refugees are being harassed
online and in the streets of urban areas in Malaysia.
should be understood in the context of the nexus between political
power, the state security apparatus, and criminal enterprise when it
comes to not only human trafficking but also corporate needs when it
comes to cheap labour, which is further complicated in the era of Covid.
non-Malay political operatives are reinforcing political narratives of
the Malay power structures they are attached to.
The MCA for
instance understands the agitation and resentment bubbling to the top in
the Malay community when it comes to this issue. This is why Low gets
battered online in the English-speaking/liberal Malay sphere and treated
as a truth-speaker in the Malay sphere.
Meanwhile, it is the
height of hypocrisy when non-Malay Harapan political operatives virtue
signal when it comes to this issue but when in power, they and their
base discarded this issue because they realised it was political
This is exactly why high-profile Malay political
operatives from Harapan who are extremely vocal on certain issues are
muted on this issue.
Someone in the Malay political establishment –
politically unaffiliated – who for years stoked this issue (for BN and
Harapan), now tells me that he is shocked by how out of control this
situation has become. And like me, he is worried about the security
The reality is, and I know folks do not want to hear this,
but if you think that we have extreme religious ideas here, you have no
clue of the extreme ideas that could be (and have been) injected into
the religious discourse by elements moving in migrant communities.
sides are attempting to get political profit from this issue. The
question then becomes which side is going to reap the rewards.
that is coming down hard on refugees or the side that wants to embrace
Why the UN Human Rights Council Has Outlived Its Usefulness By Hugh Fitzgerald
Thursday, January 06, 2022
Jihad Watch : The UN Human Rights Council has added another arrow in its
anti-Israel quiver. It is already committed, by its Agenda Item #7, to
consider at every session the “human rights situation in Palestine and
other occupied Arab territories.” Now it has established a Commission of
Inquiry (COI), to engage in an open-ended probe into Israeli “war
crimes”; the three-man commission is to be headed by the notoriously
anti-Israel Navi Pillay, who once accused Israel of deliberately mowing
down Palestinian children; it will have a staff of 24 to investigate the
putative misdeeds of the tiny Jewish state, larger than the number of
staffers – 20 – that the UNHRC now assigns to cover all of Asia,
Pacific, and the Middle East. “Let’s resolve to abolish the UN Human
Rights Council,” by Melanie Phillips, Israel Hayom, December 31, 2021:
The UNHRC vote [authorizing the formation of the
COI] took place within weeks of a report by the Human Rights Watch NGO
which accused Israel of “apartheid.”
This accusation is of course ludicrous. Israeli Arabs
demonstrably enjoy equal civic and religious rights, while the Arabs
living in the disputed territories aren’t Israeli citizens at all. Those
who accuse Israel of apartheid not only defame Israel but belittle the
real evil of apartheid in South Africa.
Yet with the three members of the commission each having a
record of extreme hostility towards Israel, there are plausible fears
that the inquiry is a stitch-up designed to produce a kind of Human
Rights Watch report on steroids – and with the imprimatur of the UN.
Moreover, the commission has no expiry date but is to issue
reports in perpetuity. In other words, it’s an institutionalized engine
of demonization and delegitimization of Israel.
This three-man commission, all of them known to be hostile to the
Jewish state – with a staff of 24 – is meant to issue quarterly reports
on the “human rights” and “war crimes” situation in Israel, the West
Bank, and Gaza, not merely for a year or two, but presumably forever,
for nothing was said either by the UNHRC or by the General Assembly,
which authorized the financing of the COI, about its ever coming to an
end. It’s an open-ended probe of “war crimes” supposedly committed by
those endlessly wicked Israelis.
There are particular fears that the inquiry’s criminal
charge sheet may result in Israelis being hauled before the
International Criminal Court (ICC), which has previously displayed bias
against Israel. However, the ICC’s new prosecutor, the British
lawyer Karim Khan QC, may not be the pushover [by the anti-Israeli
crowd] that might be assumed from the court’s previous record.
At his first news conference in The Hague earlier this month,
he said he would be reviewing his over-heavy caseload – which currently
includes a deeply contentious investigation into accusations against
Israel made by the “State of Palestine.”
Khan, QC, the new prosecutor at the International Criminal Court,
sounds as though he thinks the ICC’s docket has been overburdened with
cases, and that he will therefore be decreasing his caseload, pruning it
of the least meritorious and least convincing cases of putative
misdeeds. He has still not endorse the charges brought against Israel by
the “State of Palestine,” as he might have — a good sign. More
importantly, he added that he would only proceed in cases that had a
“realistic prospect of conviction.” Another good sign.
So even if the Pillay commission’s toxic ball
lands at Khan’s feet, it doesn’t follow that he will necessarily pick it
up and run with it.
Karim Khan’s remarks about are evidence that he is not to be counted
as automatically anti-Israel. The Palestinians who have been overloaded
the ICC docket with accusations against Israel, will no doubt assume
that a prosecutor named Karim Khan will be on their side; I suspect from
his statement that they will be most disappointed.
Nevertheless, the real menace of this inquiry
lies in its potential to demonize Israel in the eyes of the world
regardless of any court proceedings. Such delegitimization not only
makes people indifferent to attempts by Israel’s enemies to wage war
against it, but also causes leading nations to seek to thwart its
attempts at self-defense.
The UNHRC’s decision to establish this permanent Commission of
Inquiry to look into misdeeds, including “war crimes,“ of Israel alone,
coming on top of the Agenda Item #7 that commits the UN Human Rights
Council, at every session, to report on the “human rights situation in
Palestine and other occupied Arab territories,” the world’s unwary —
which is most of us — are likely to assume that there must surely be
something terribly wrong with Israel, for so many investigations to be
interminably launched into its conduct. This is what the author, Melanie
Phillips, means by the potential of the COI to “demonize” Israel in the
eyes of the world. Even If the ICC’s prosecutor, Karim Khan, decides
not to bring charges against Israel before the International Criminal
Court because of a lack of convincing evidence, the damage to Israel’s
image will still have been done. The Jewish state’s enemies – especially
the terror groups Hamas, PIJ, and Hezbollah — will be heartened, and
“leading nations” may try to dissuade Israel from its perfectly
legitimate attempts at self-defense. Because the terror groups
deliberately hide themselves, their weapons, and their rocket launchers
in civilian buildings – schools, hospitals, apartment buildings, it is
not possible for the IDF to avoid all civilian casualties, though it
makes heroic efforts to minimize them. And because of those unavoidable
civilian casualties, there are countries that try to prevent Israel from
defending itself. They demand of the Jewish state an impossible purity
of arms that they demand of no other country, including themselves.
Accordingly, the Pillay inquiry constitutes an
existential attack against Israel – the latest product of an obscene and
exterminatory UNHRC obsession.
The council and its predecessor body the Commission on Human
Rights – whose members have included such human rights abusers as Saudi
Arabia, China, Cuba, Pakistan and Russia – have passed more resolutions
condemning Israel than every other country in the world combined, while
adopting no resolutions on human rights abuses committed in China, Cuba
obsessive focus by the UN Council on Human Rights on Israel as a
“violator” of human rights is accompanied by an equally disturbing
unconcern with such abusers of human rights as Saudi Arabia, China,
Cuba, North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, and Russia.
These visionaries failed to grasp that, since the
world was dominated by states and regimes that were both repressive and
deeply imbued with Jew-hatred and hostility to Israel, any world body
or supra-national system of law would itself become an accomplice to
tyranny and antisemitism.
I’m not sure that Melanie Phillips is correct in stating that the
world has been dominated by states that are “deeply imbued with
Jew-hatred and hostility to Israel”; this strikes me as a more recent
phenomenon, one that is linked to two things: the vast increase in
wealth and political influence of the Sunni Arab states of the Gulf, and
the enormous increase in the Muslim population in Europe and North
America, which has spread antisemitic and anti-Israel views.
That’s why “lawfare,” or the weaponization of
international law to wage war with better PR, has become a prime weapon
against Israel, singling out the Jewish people alone for such unhinged
Along with terror attacks on Israeli Jews, and the attacks on
Israel’s economic wellbeing promoted by the army of BDSers, the
Palestinians have used the UN to attack Israel as a “violator of human
rights” when, at every session of the UN Human Rights Council, Agenda
Item #7 is brought up. Now they will have still another lawfare weapon,
that to be found in the open-ended investigation of “Israeli war crimes”
that will be conducted by the UNHRC Commission of Inquiry.
If the decent nations of the world, led by the United States, and
including most European nations, as well as Canada and Australia, were
to halt their funding of the UN unless and until the UNHRC were shut
down as “a malignant promoter of antisemitism in its singling out of
Israel for criticism,” it just might come to pass. The US alone provides
more than $11 billion a year to the UN, between one-fifth and
one-quarter of the UN’s total budget. China, with an economy close in
size to that of the US, contributes far less – only $1.7 billion a year.
America’s withdrawal of its support to the UN would require the
organization to pull in its horns. If in addition, the other Western
nations were to join the US in withholding funds, this would amount to a
70% decrease in the organization’s budget. This would cripple the UN.
Or, if a wholesale shutting-down of the UN Human Rights Council seems
inadvisable to some of its critics, then another tack might be taken. In
order for the UN to retain the financial support of the US and its
allies, the Human Rights Council could continue to exist, but would be
required to get rid of both Agenda Item #7 (that requires the UNHRC to
take up Israeli “violations of the human rights of Palestinians” at
every session) and of the newly-formed Commission of Inquiry, with its
open-ended investigation of Israeli “war crimes.”
Italy: 30 foreigners surround 19-year-old woman, grope her and try to undress her By Robert Spencer
Jihad Watch : The most common countries of origin among recent migrants to Italy
include Tunisia, Egypt, Bangladesh, Iran, Ivory Coast (37% Muslim),
Iraq, Guinea (85% Muslim), Morocco, Eritrea (36% Muslim), and Sudan.
Thus it is likely that these 30 foreigners were Muslim migrants.
Why does this keep happening? In France, a Muslim quoted Qur’an while raping his victim. A survivor of a Muslim rape gang in the UK has said that
her rapists would quote the Qur’an to her, and believed their actions
justified by Islam. Thus it came as no surprise when Muslim migrants in
France raped a girl and videoed the rape while praising Allah and invoking the Qur’an. In India, a Muslim gave a Qur’an and a prayer rug to the woman he was holding captive and repeatedly raping.
And the victim of an Islamic State jihadi rapist recalled:
“He told me that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an
unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to God…He
said that raping me is his prayer to God.” In India,
a Muslim kidnapped and raped a 14-year-old Hindu girl, and forced her
to read the Qur’an and Islamic prayers. In Pakistan, another Christian
woman recounted that
her rapist was also religious:
“He threw me on the bed and started to
rape me. He demanded I marry him and convert to Islam. I refused. I am
not willing to deny Jesus and he said that if I would not agree he would
kill me.” Rapists demanded that another girl’s family turn her over to
them, claiming that she had recited the Islamic profession of faith during the rape and thus could not live among infidels.
The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for
sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right
hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet,
tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to
bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more
suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah
Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women
do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may
be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
However, anyone who points all this out will be excoriated as a “racist” and an “Islamophobe,” and accordingly ignored. If these foreigners aren’t Muslims, this incident still illustrates some of the folly and danger of mass migration.
“‘Surrounded and harassed by 30 foreigners.’ The horror a stone’s
throw from the Duomo,” translated from “‘Accerchiata e molestata da 30
stranieri’. L’orrore a due passi dal Duomo,” by Francesca Galici, Il Giornale, January 1, 2022 (thanks to Gary Fouse):
It was just past 1:30 AM on New Year’s Eve when a girl
was surrounded and harassed by about 30 boys near the Palazzo Reale in
Milan, in the city center, a few steps from Piazza del Duomo. The
19-year-old tried to defend herself using the bag she carried with her,
which was grabbed by her attackers as she tried to push them away.
This is the girl’s story. She told law enforcement that she had been
groped and that at one point the group even tried to undress her.
Fortunately, there were numerous law enforcement and police officers in
the area, who quickly received the young woman’s alarm and were able to
At the sight of the uniforms, the attackers disappeared in various
directions, making their escape. The girl was immediately rescued by the
officers, and for her, beyond a huge fright and shock, there were no
more serious consequences. The young woman told investigators that her
group of attackers was allegedly of foreign origin.
The fact has brought to light an age-old security problem common to
all large cities on New Year’s Eve. It was 2016 when, in Cologne,
Germany, 90 women reported having suffered harassment and violence by
about 1000 drunk men, described by the victims as “apparently of Arab
Violence on New Year’s Eve
In that same area, a short distance from where the 19-year-old was
attacked, just before dawn there was another episode of violence, with a
fight that led to the injury of some young people. According to the
first reconstructions, it seems an 18-year-old was stabbed in the neck
by a 16-year-old at the height of a quarrel near Piazza del Duomo. Now
the 18-year-old is hospitalized at the Milan polyclinic and is in
serious condition. The operators found him in a pool of blood and her
conditions immediately appeared very serious, so much so that now the
young man struggles between life and death.
In all, 10 fights were recorded yesterday near the center of Milan.
The work carried out by the police was important, who, in riot gear,
guarded the pizza del Duomo and the surrounding areas trying to reduce
the gatherings but it was impossible to avoid the formation of boys’
hats. Moments of tension also occurred in decentralized areas, such as
Piazza Gae Aulenti, after around midnight the cars carried out an
intervention due to an attack suffered by two boys by 7 foreigners.
two young people, aged 18 and 19, were transported to the
Fatebenefratelli hospital in Milan in yellow code with head and chest
injuries caused by broken bottles.
Harapan has, not communications, but credibility issues - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
For Commander Thaya's detractors, he was in the Navy long before you were swimming in your father's balls or just a dirty glint in your daddy's eyes!!
Malaysiakini : “If a political party does not have its foundation in the
determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then
it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.”- Dwight D. Eisenhower
COMMENT | DAP supremo Lim Kit Siang said recently that Pakatan Harapan needs to
resolve its “communication failures” before the next GE if not it will
suffer from “misperceptions”. The four issues plaguing Harapan as enunciated by Kit Siang are not communication problems but rather credibility problems.Do not get me wrong. Harapan’s messaging, to put it bluntly, sucks.
It is extremely difficult getting the messaging right when you claim to
be an egalitarian coalition when you are too busy not spooking the
However, this could be overcome by tempering propaganda and concentrating on bread and butter issues.The
credibility problem is more damaging and points to the dysfunctional
nature of opposition politics in this country and the often toxic nature
of the discourse that Harapan engineers. As for the
“contradictory perception” that the DAP was both anti -Malay and sold
out the non -Malays. The former is a political strategy as admitted by
none other than the son of the old maverick. Mukhriz
Mahathir is on record as saying the demonisation of the DAP by Umno,
and by extension, all Malay uber alles parties, was a specific political
strategy when they could not answer for the failings of governance.
latter, though, is factual - the result of crushed expectations and a
deliberate policy to benefit the Malay polity at the expense of the non-
Malays. How do we know this?
We know this because the
former Harapan prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad said so when publicly
castrating Lim Guan Eng, who was the finance minister then.
recap, Mahathir said - "We still have to give them, but what we gave to
them was very small (compared to what the Malays got). But we could not
say it then, because then the Chinese would be angry. "That's why we
didn't talk about that. But now we have to because I have to explain
So, this idea of the DAP “selling out” the non-
Malays is in reality the kind of politics that the DAP accused the MCA
Not to mention while Guan Eng was kowtowing to the
old maverick, he was waging a very public war with the MCA over the
funding of TAR University College (TAR UC), going so far as telling the
MCA, "Your time is up, your time is over. Let it be run as an
While an education establishment, like
UiTM – a bumiputera only one – gets all the funding it needs, TAR UC has
to contend with the political machinations of the DAP using “government
funding“ as window dressing to carry on a petty political dispute with
an adversary it claims has no power or influence in the Chinese
This is why the Bangsa Malaysia kool-aid is so damaging
to Harapan. The DAP for instance propagates this nonsense but neither
in agenda nor policy does it have any intention of living up to this
I would argue that this propaganda has become some sort of political brainwashing.
second issue is of course the failure of Harapan to deliver reforms. It
is extremely cynical to claim that the Sheraton Move derailed the
reform agenda. Firstly the prime minister had claimed that corruption
was no longer a serious issue in Malaysia.
Like I said in my
previous piece, the old maverick prefers to advance a false narrative
rather than confront the reality of corruption in Malaysia with all its
Then the old maverick claimed that corruption brought down the Harapan government. Meanwhile, Harapan
political operatives were busy attempting to retain power and
publically feuding over who deserved to be prime minister when they
obviously did not have the numbers to even make such a decision.
as far as the reform agenda, Mahathir said that the Harapan manifesto
was not worth the paper it was printed on - “We thought we were going to
lose. We put in tough things in the manifesto so that if we lose, the
(BN) government would be in a quandary (after winning the polls)."
“But now, we are the government. We are victims of our own manifesto.”
And before you go blaming the old maverick, Lim Guan Eng
later admitted that everyone knew that Mahathir was not committed to
the manifesto as reported in press – “Prime Minister Dr Mahathir
Mohamad was no longer committed to fulfilling Pakatan Harapan's election
pledges, claimed DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng.”
now know that the Sheraton Move was orchestrated by elements, including
the former prime minister, and all Harapan and the DAP did was hoodwink
the public by claiming that all was the figment of the imagination of
As for the third point, that of ending the political
hegemony of Umno. This all goes back to the Manichean view of politics
that comes with two-party systems. Ending Umno hegemony means attempting
to reform the system not merely replacing the pieces on the political
The fact that Harapan chose to continue existing
racial and religious policies and use the excuse of time, may satisfy
hardcore supporters but for those who harken back to the days of Umno
stability, this does not carry any water.
Harapan could have
formulated policies and funded entitlement programmes which actually
would have helped the dominant Malay polity - but it instead attempted
to take over existing Umno programmes to maintain political hegemony and
the result is that Umno still managed to make a comeback, with
convicted political operatives leading the charge while embroiled in
internal party feuds.
And finally the MOU. Come on, Harapan and
the DAP were not transparent about this issue at all. The original deal
that could have been made with former prime minister Muhddyin Yassin was
the better deal. Indeed one of the architects - or at least the public
face of the first one - said more or less the same thing.
Harapan used the first deal to go for the killing blow and turned this
country over to a bunch of incompetent political operatives.
second MOU, or whatever it is called, is proving to be a fig leaf and
not worth the time commenting on, so communicating to the rakyat of this
worthless deal should not be in the messaging of Harapan.
someone who supported both initiatives, the failure of both serves to
remind me how duplicitous political operatives are. As if I needed
reminding but I was honestly hoping that some sort of bipartisanship
would serve the public better.
How on earth could Harapan
supporters believe anything coming from Harapan? We need an opposition
to hold the establishment accountable but so far all Harapan is
demonstrating is that it wants to replace the establishment without
changing the system. Wouldn’t folks just vote for the original instead of the neo?
Malaysiakini : “Equality may be a fiction but nonetheless one must accept it as a governing principle.”― BR Ambedkar
COMMENT | In his rather downer New Year’s Eve speech,
former (twice) prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, as reported in the
press, said “…politics in Malaysia had become 'bad', and that the
country was on track to becoming a failed nation”.
yes, the country has been on that track for some time now. It is
pointless going over who put us on this track because the fact remains
there has never been a political coalition that wants to get us off this
If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over
again expecting different results, then this yearly hoping for change
from the political establishment (which includes the opposition) is
well, insane or maybe just a comforting delusion that the political
class encourages and certain voting polities eagerly cling too.
The reality is that Mahathir (above)
is right. Little will change, or rather, little will change for the
better. The change, if any, is the accelerated dismantling of our civil,
economic and social rights under the guise of Malay/Muslim social,
political and religious cohesion.
there were a central historical narrative as to why this country
failed, it would not be because of corruption. It would be that our
public institutions, our private and public spaces were overwhelmed by
toxic religiosity that enabled a class of potentates free from the
sanctions of secular laws – unlike the tenuous grip such laws now have
on the ruling class.
People like Mahathir propagandise corruption
as the route to a failed state but this is a false narrative. There has
always been corruption in this country. What has made the system worse,
the corruption acceptable are the efforts of religious extremists who
are slowly emerging from the shadows. These religious fellow travellers
use global economic and social vagaries as an excuse to further spread a
toxic form of religiosity to control any agitation in the dominant
We are at this weird moment on the destination of a
failed nation status. Religious extremists are using gullible,
kleptocratic political operatives to further their agendas, but there
has never been a time when opposition to such agendas has been the most
vocal. There is a false comfort in that.
Folks fixate on
political personalities and while their attention is diverted, a whole
slew of legally challengeable actions are attempted as some sort of
dress rehearsal then withdrawn – in some cases – as a nod to
Think about it. When he babbled on about a Muslim-only cabinet in 2017, his dream came through with the treacherous Sheraton Move.
fact that the current bloated monstrosity masquerading as a cabinet
that Abdul Hadi Awang envisioned is running this country is not the
Maintain a facade
The point is that
there are more than enough fellow travellers in the political, security
and bureaucratic apparatus who believe that this is the natural
God-given order of things.
Do not get me wrong. The reason why
this country has been able to maintain the facade of being a “moderate”
Islamic country is the urban demographic and policy decisions that
enabled relative economic success despite all the leakages. In other
words, there was political will that this country would not turn into
just another failed Islamic state.
The kidnapping of
Pastor Raymond Koh and Amri Che Mat has emboldened religious operatives
who believe their agendas supersede that of the state. The numerous
deaths in custody normalise a certain kind of behaviour in the state
Both make the supplanting of civilian rule to something darker much easier, especially with a cowed public.
some Muslim countries, Saudi Arabia being the most glaring example, the
idea of moderation as an economic survival mechanism is slowly gaining
in fact could make the claim that at one time, it was the kind of
moderate Muslim success story that other countries could emulate.
Political situation unstable
while some Muslim countries learnt the hard way, that religious fascism
destroyed their country, Malaysia is determined to tread that path.
Because the political situation is unstable and because the ketuanan mentality
has never dealt with disparate political coalitions, desperate
political operatives are retreating to old tools that they believed
ensured political hegemony.
The funny thing is that state
governments controlled by the opposition bend over backwards to
accommodate Muslims’ preoccupations and have to continuously defend
themselves against charges of racism.
This is why religious extremists understand that they do not need political power to change social and political paradigms.
they need are feckless “reformers” who use religion (as they do as a
means of control) and non- Muslim political operatives who gaslight the
non-Muslim polity on respect and tolerance when the state is busy
dismantling rights that ensure such tolerance and respect.
these natural disasters, political machinations and the ongoing meltdown
of the opposition is the fertile field in which these religious
operators, aided by desperate political operatives, will continue
planting their divisive policies.
This is what we have to look
forward to in 2022. I hope that rational Malaysians will not buy into
the kool-aid and remember that although we have not held the political
establishment accountable for various partisan reasons, what makes us
Malaysian, still shines through in moments of adversity.
BN and Harapan immoral disaster management - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Wednesday, December 29, 2021
Malaysiakini : "What kind of help? I don't know. You can call BN or Pakatan Harapan the same, all trying to play money politics now." - Taman Sri Muda resident M Uvarajan
| Bangi MP Ong Kian Ming’s sharing of his sunburn tweet captures the
narcissism of some Harapan political operatives in dealing with this
flood. Ong is so insecure that online folks are dissing the flood activism that
he needs to respond to folks (anonymous or otherwise) that his actions are the real deal. It is not. Any time you see a political operative at a disaster site dressed in
the required yellow boots or otherwise posing as if they are doing
something, chances are they are not.Ong’s role in this disaster,
as is the role of any federal MP, is to coordinate with the federal
bureaucracy and keep updating the rakyat on the efforts of the federal
government to mitigate the problems of those affected.
state assemblypersons should be organising volunteer efforts and
coordinating with various state agencies, NGOs, and the federal
apparatus to ensure that whatever aid given is coordinated and not
replicated while maintaining lines of communication with the public and
If the report is true and the army had decided to
intervene in flood relief efforts because of the inaction of state and
federal operators, this opens up a whole can of worms when it comes to
how the state and the federal governments are interacting when it comes
to the welfare of the people.
All those fait acommpli
statements by federal operatives and the Selangor MB sanctioning this
intervention by the army is not only perverse – the army should have
been called in immediately – but points to the dysfunctional politics of
The man who wants to be the prime minister, Anwar Ibrahim, calls for another useless royal commission of inquiry (RCI) on this whole fiasco because he needs to deflect from the utter incompetence of his own cohorts in running the state.
would argue for an independent third-party post mortem on Selangor’s
response to this disaster that includes flood preparation but what would
be the point?
Meanwhile, the man who is prime minister says for
him “everyone must be held accountable,” which basically means no one
will be held accountable and all this will devolve into a partisan
Each side attempts to shape the narrative that
folks were left stranded, abandoned, and in some cases dead, because of
the inaction of the other side.
can see the politics at play when it comes to the state National
Disaster Management Agency (Nadma) position when DAP veteran Lim Kit
Siang implying that the PM had something to do with the change of
position – which he most probably did – and Syahredzan Johan asking "Why didn’t the (then) Selangor NSC chairperson call for a state-level NSC meeting?"
Menteri Besar Amirudin Shari said that his not being the state-level
chief of Nadma hampered efforts but he did all that he could including
calling the prime minister and pleading for federal help.
the reportage is factual and the Selangor Nadma were reluctant in
calling in the army’s help, then there is a severe dereliction of duty
and there should be an investigation.
All this, of course, would
turn into a partisan witch-hunt and unfortunately, no lesson would be
learnt beyond partisans demonising each other.
Circular firing squad
real question is why the Selangor MB did not call for a meeting with
all relevant agencies. Indeed why didn’t the MB, Harapan operatives in
the state and federal levels offer the rakyat a coordinated plan of
action instead of Twitter and Facebook activism of touring the disaster
site and showboating?
Malaysian Relief Agency (MRA) vice-president
Khairil Annuar Khalid claimed: “They (authorities and agencies) have no
idea what to do because Klang Valley has never experienced a flood like
this. There was no coordination between the federal and state
governments, as well as inter-district coordination.”
first point at first seems reasonable but considering that Selangor
(Klang Valley) has a host of environmental issues which occur on a
regular basis, claiming that you were not prepared for this kind of
flooding when flooding does occur on a regular basis, makes fools of the
folks who voted for you.
Now of course everyone seems to be
pointing their fingers at various departments and agencies, which they
claim were not listened to.
All of this actually amounts to a
circular firing squad and the fact that political operatives only listen
to experts when they tell them things they want to hear and very often
federal and state agencies are ignored because, as I said, the issues
they bring up are not sexy enough for partisan appetites.
When I was in the armed forces, you made plans for the worst-case scenario and not only for things you can handle.
are enough policy and environmental wonks in Selangor who have been
sounding the alarm for better preparedness for years but who have been
ignored by the political apparatus.
The reality is that relevant state authorities and disaster management
response teams do not get the same kind of political consideration as do
other more press-friendly issues that state operators deem important to
keep them in power.
The second point shows how the political
culture in this country has become so toxic, that the average rakyat is
at the mercy of political operatives who only seem responsive to their
needs – and badly at that – when they can score political points.
should be arguing that the federal response was not complete horse
manure but the reality is that the state is the first responder and how
the state deals with this disaster demonstrate not only a lack of
planning and coordination but more importantly, a lack of empathy.
we have reports that “foreigners” were saving people, everyday citizens
were helping out each other and folks had to hire boats to save
themselves and their families.
Former minister Rafidah Aziz had
it right when it came to the federal response when she said: “All that
the government seems to understand is to fall back on cash handouts,
when people have lost their clothes and wouldn’t even be able to shop
for things, with roads and vehicles badly damaged.”
itself to a higher standard and they should because this current
government is demonstrating that it has no problem sinking to depths
unheard of in past administrations, but all this just proves that
Harapan yet again, could not organise an orgy in a brothel.
What flood says of this government for the people - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Malaysiakini : “A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.” - Edward R Murrow
COMMENT | Around this time, I usually put forward my own top news story and newsmaker of the year. This
year, however, for me at least, the top news story is the flood and how
the aftermath was badly mismanaged but more importantly, the ordinary
Malaysians who come out to help their brethren in this time of crisis.
When it comes to the situation in Selangor, for instance, what we
have seen is total incompetency and blame-shifting from the people who
always claimed to be the better choice or “the lesser of two evils” –
the common speak of partisans.
Meanwhile, the federal government’s response borders, I believe, on the criminally negligent.
flood has exposed not only the systemic dysfunction of a federal
bureaucracy that only exists to sustain the hegemonic interests of ketuanan political parties but also the indifference of political elites towards the rakyat.
you imagine the deep cynicism and complete indifference to the
suffering of flood victims when Women, Family and Community Development
Minister Rina Harun stages her clean-up efforts?
know this was staged because various volunteers and citizens have been
sending me images of what it took to stage such an event.
so mendacious was this stunt, that an old PAS friend, who is carrying
out relief efforts on behalf of PAS, was livid and went on a long text
rant about how “uncaring” this publicity stunt was.
citizens did not rise to the challenge, this could have been much worse.
What this flood has demonstrated is that the rakyat cannot rely on the
The old conservative in me, who was always
distrustful of big government, was conflicted because, even at a local
level, the rakyat was let down.
course this being Malaysia, there were incidents where some folks
decided that it was a good time to bring in race and religion.
fact that the hard work and spirit of volunteerism by all ethnic groups
centred in a gurdwara was called into question by certain elements is
further proof (as if we needed any) that the racial and religious
indoctrination by the political establishment threatens to destroy the
fabric of Malaysian society.
Remember when in July of this year, PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang was reported
in the press as saying that any decisions made in managing a disaster
should place religion above other matters, including to preserve
This is why the current government handing out token sums to people who have lost everything, is just sickening.
Federal government failed
Meanwhile, politicians from both sides of the aisle were in damage control mode.
of which is pointless because there is enough blame to go around, but
the cold hard truth is that the federal government failed in carrying
out its responsibilities and obligations.
Agencies such as the
police and the fire and rescue services failed in meeting the task that
they were supposed to be trained for.
For years the PDRM arrogantly claimed that they had the best interest of the rakyat at heart.
with all the scandals facing the police force, one would have thought
that this was the time when they mobilised and rose to the occasion.
I may be biased but the situation could have been a lot worse if the army did not step in.
fact is that the armed services, and their various tributaries, should
have been mobilised. But instead, a certain kind of paralysis prevented
the political apparatus from discharging its duties.
paralysis happens when you spend most of your time – if you are a Malay
uber alles party promoting racial and religious supremacy – and if you
are the opposition, telling everyone that you would do things
differently but unfortunately, you don’t.
As someone from the
state security apparatus who can remember a time, when the government
was at least functioning even if mired in the slowly simmering tensions
of race and religion, I know, what a functional response is, to these
At least they were natural at one time, but
corporate and political interests sustained by cronyism and corruption
made such disasters unnatural.
I mean, are folks still wondering
why federal and state authorities are carrying out projects which are
obviously detrimental to the urban ecosystem?
Honestly, most of
our “natural disasters” are self-inflicted. One coalition starts
something which is obviously going to cause problems down the road and
the other merely carries on the project blaming the actions of the
coalition that preceded it.
Does this sound familiar? How has that been working out for Malaysians?
glimmer of hope in this tragedy is that while the government did not
rise to the challenge, average Malaysians rose to the challenge.
showed compassion and empathy that is missing from the political
apparatus. They did the hard work of organising and going out to face
the vagaries of the flood head-on, instead of doing drive-bys.
we should reclaim the term “Malaysia Boleh” because those folks
demonstrated they had the right stuff, unlike the current government.
As the new year approaches, I recall Romans 14:19 – “So then, let us pursue what leads to peace and to mutual edification.”
It's been good talking to you this year, Malaysia, whoever you are.
DAP’s Malay appeasement and non-Malay resentment problem - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Malaysiakini : “How can you thank a man for giving you what's already yours? How
then can you thank him for giving you only part of what is yours?” - Malcolm X
COMMENT | In calling for the old guard to make the ultimate sacrifice by stepping down, Malaysiakini assistant editor Zikri Kamarulzaman made this rather queer point about how the DAP has failed to make an inroad into the Malay community because of “the anti-Malay DAP bogeyman that Umno, Bersatu and PAS like to harp on”.
Hence, “…if these veterans really do have DAP’s interest at heart and
if they really want their party to make more inroads among the Malay
community - they must step aside and make way for new leaders”.
in other words, because of racist propaganda, these leaders have to
step aside for new leaders, and what then, will the propaganda stop for
these new leaders?
Remember Muhkriz Mahathir has publicly stated
that the anti-DAP propaganda was a concerted effort by Umno to demonise
the DAP when they could not provide solutions to any given problem. In
other words, this is a strategy and not about personalities.
Do not get me wrong. For nearly a decade now, I have explored much like what another Malaysiakini associate editor Martin Vengadesan does here
about how DAP is essentially a Chinese-based party with token Indian
and other representation all wrapped up in a weird cult-like ideology of
toxic online behaviour and national victimhood.
It is as if
Umno’s Chinese bogeyman political party was willed into existence after
decades of racial and religious policies and a certain percentage of the
electorate is suffering from some form of PTSD.
Furthermore, the Bangsa Malaysia ‘kool aid’ is an even more dangerous form of propaganda than anything the state came up with.
only was it mendacious, the DAP as a political party certainly did not
reflect such inclusivity but more importantly in terms of policy
decisions did not aspire to what the DAP was pushing to its base,
sublimating honest conversations about race and privilege in this
So yes, the DAP
must reflect in party composition the multi-racial ethos it claims to
have. This would mean a crucial overhaul of well, everything, and the
abandoning of the sycophantic culture which defines the party at the
The problem with Martin’s piece, like Zikri’s, is that
both assume a new batch of younger leaders would not be stamped by the
imprimatur of the old guard.
These young leaders, including some
named by Martin, have done nothing to demonstrate that they would be any
different from the old guard; indeed in many instances, they are
responsible for promoting much of racial and religious compromises that
the old guard and indeed many Malaysians believe forms the social
contract in Malaysia.
In Pakatan Harapan’s brief tenure in the
federal government, former prime minister (twice) Dr Mahathir Mohamad
publicly castrated Lim Guan Eng, when he said that Lim had to run
everything through him before he made any important decisions.
there was a concerted effort to give the Malays more at the expense of
the Chinese community, but nothing could be said at the time because
this would upset the DAP’s non-Malay base.
Zikri contends that
these new leaders of DAP must “…strike a balance between its ‘liberal’
ideals and the conservative realities of Malaysian politics”.
Malay power structures
my experience, conservatism in the Malaysian context means do not spook
the Malays which essentially translates to do not disrupt the existing
political paradigm even though it has proven extremely toxic
economically, socially and politically to the majority community.
This is exactly what Lim and probably most DAP supporters found out when the party assumed federal power with its allies.
DAP, like the MCA, has engaged with Malay power structures in much the
same way, that is, through appeasement and rejecting the secular and
egalitarian values they preach to their base.
This has always been
the problem for Malaysians who want an honest deal. This is the
definition of “moderate politics” in Malaysia and that has resulted in
the erosion of our public and private spaces because the Malay political
establishment had no pushback whatsoever from compliant non-Malay
This is why in 2019, Harapan non-Malay
political operatives were accused of not defending non-bumiputera rights
on the matriculation quota (for instance) by Gerakan, another
supposedly multi-racial political party.
“Oh Tong Keong said the
fact that the Harapan government had agreed to maintain the 90 percent
quota for bumiputera students in the matriculation programme, was due to
failure by DAP to assist more non-bumiputeras to enter in the
“He said Education Minister Maszlee Malik’s statement linking the matriculation quota to language requirements for job opportunities was uncalled for.”
is what non-Malay political operatives do. They cannibalise each other
because the role of the non-Malay political operatives is to provide a
fig leaf of moderation and inclusivity for their Malay counterparts.
has of course resulted in non-Malay resentment. Non-Malays like to
think that the political parties that they support will stand up for
their rights. That these parties will act as a counter-balance to the
extreme political and religious impulses of the Malay establishment.
Propaganda and brainwashing
reality is that both the MCA and the DAP while playing the moderate
game failed to do this, and the Malay polity - that which supports Malay
uber alles parties - has become further entrenched in the propaganda
and brainwashing carried out by the state.
There is nothing
radical about calling for new leaders or forming a new political party.
What is radical is actually adhering to the supposedly progressive ideas
the party claims to have.
What is radical is maintaining a
strictly secular political stance. What is radical is working with
anyone on issues constructively even though such parties do not
subscribe to your views for the betterment of the country.
is radical is rejecting policies by any parties (even those you have
worked with on certain issues) if such policies go against democratic
and egalitarian norms.
In other words, ideology is the draw of the
party and not a race, even though there will be a section of the
majority polity who will never be drawn to what you are offering. This would mean the goal of federal power is not the sole motivation and yes, federal power may not be in reach. This
means not blindly supporting your coalition partners merely because
their unhinged strategy is supposed to bring the coalition to federal
Folks like to use realpolitik when they actually mean that
non-Malay political operatives have to be Pak Turuts. If this country is going down a theocratic manure hole, the best
we can hope for is that there will be a non-Malay uber alles political
coalition as opposed to the non-Malay political establishment that is
not complicit in this.
In Kedah, DAP is demonstrating the right stuff - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Malaysiakini : “The decision of the Kedah state government to not renew such
gaming licences is ultra vires the Constitution as the power to issue
such licences is exclusively within the jurisdiction of Parliament.”
- DAP's national legal bureau chairperson Ramkarpal Singh
COMMENT | As for the trouncing of Pakatan Harapan in Malacca, I wrote this a few articles back:
of course, all this boils down to messaging. Harapan’s messaging sucks.
Nobody is interested in the principles that Lim (Kit Siang) talks
about, even the non-Malays, because even when Harapan fails to carry out
reforms, they would still vote for them anyway to spite Umno/BN/PN.
Therefore, the base can take a lot.
“Harapan should tailor its message on a state level instead of
attempting a grand national narrative that more often than not does not
resonate. Mind you, these state-level messaging may at times conflict
with the national message that Harapan is putting out.
is to be as vague as possible so the other side cannot pin you down.
Hammer down bread-and-butter issues on a local level because, more often
than not, national agendas mean very little to folks struggling to make
Having said that, DAP is on point when it comes to the Kedah issue.
Here, in the words of the Kedah menteri besar, is the key to religious and racial extremism in Malaysia:
am a Muslim and cannot gamble. Later in the hereafter, I will be asked
what I did on this issue, and if I did not do anything, I will be
punished. While I have the power, I should use it.”
Power, in this
case, is used to destabilise the economic rights of non-Malays in the
pursuit of the political and religious agendas of his political
Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor explained that his policy to
ban number-betting outlets was his way of obeying God's command and
giving thanks for the state's many blessings.
Malaysians should face this extremism head-on as what the DAP is doing by helping local Kedahans mount a legal challenge against this ban.
being unreasonable means using your religious beliefs to enact a ban
that you have no power to carry out, maybe justice will be served.
If being unreasonable means telling Malaysians to be creative and find other means of earning a living, perhaps justice will be served.
being unreasonable means telling non-Muslims that their rights are
subject to the religious interpretations of an individual, then maybe
justice will be served.
The decision made by the PAS menteri besar
is a decision of a racial supremacist. Keep in mind that in this
country, race and religion are not mutually exclusive.
Do not take
my word for it. He says so right here: “There are many Muslims here.
The decision was made based on the need to maintain harmony and on the
basis of being grateful for the bountiful blessings.”
Now, of course, Sanusi is the kind of political operative who says the quiet part out loud, which basically means, for the ketuanan
(supremacist) types, every policy decision they make is based on the
fact that the Malays are the majority and the rest of us should be “pak turut” (yes men).
Racial and religious extremism does not happen in a vacuum. Right now, as reported in the press, the prime minister has “proposed quotas
for Bumiputera-owned businesses in strategic locations such as shopping
malls as part of efforts to increase the community’s participation in
this is being done under the Keluarga Malaysia concept, which, like the
ruling of the Kedah menteri besar, is a display of raw racial and
religious power. What we are dealing with is the fallout from the
fractured Malay political establishment.
I have no idea if there is a good-natured and good-hearted majority who would speak up against such injustices.
view is that the majority polity, after decades of policymaking by the
ruling elite and an opposition who does not offer an alternative,
probably believes that the political class, following the will of God,
is beneficial to the majority polity.
Not to mention the rights and privileges that give them preferential treatment in everything from education to housing.
those Malays who do speak are targeted by the state and are left high
and dry by Malay political operatives who are supposedly progressive and
enabled by non-Malay political operatives who need Malay political
power to have any input in policymaking decisions.
In this context, the DAP stepping up and standing up for the rights of all Malaysians is something to be acknowledged.
fact that PKR and Amanah have not joined in on this legal action says a
lot, but for those Malaysians who do not believe that fascist menteris
besar should get away with their religious bigotry, we must
acknowledge that the DAP is going out on a limb here politically.
What the DAP is doing, by mounting a legal challenge for local Kedahans, is the way democracy should work.
the DAP is doing in this instance - and they should be doing a lot more
of this - is fighting for the legal, economic, and social rights of all
Malaysians but specifically the non-Malays, which strangely, other
supposedly progressive Malay political operatives should be doing but
When I say all Malaysians, I mean all Malaysians
regardless of race, religious affiliation, or gender identity. This is
the antithesis of what the PAS political operative Sanusi views as the
Now I get that the DAP will be
demonised by mainstream Malay political operatives and who knows if this
action will be disavowed by members of their own coalition.
this does give non-Malays a fighting chance because at least somebody
in the political establishment is fighting for their basic rights and
attempting to push back on the racial and religious extremism that is
faced by the non-Malay polity.
This is far better than what the MCA and Gerakan are doing. Gerakan wanting to have a “chat” with the menteri besar who rebuffed them just shows you how ineffectual they are but more importantly how PAS views them.
The MCA actually having the nerve to accuse the DAP of placating Muslims voters because of the crucifix mix-up is downright laughable.
Get one thing straight, the DAP placates their Malay coalition partners but, then again, so does the MCA.
the DAP in this instance demonstrates the right stuff, which is far
more than what the rest of the non-Malay political establishment is
I sincerely hope that the DAP continues these attempts of
pushing back against racial and religious extremism and this inspires
Malaysians to mount legal challenges against extremist laws. But
then again, I am someone who believes in free speech, freedom of
religion, and, well, good old-fashioned democratic ideas, which I
suppose makes folks like me the fringe minority.