Robert Spencer : Numbers from late last year show that Marine LePen would win 35% of
the vote in a 2027 presidential election in France, a little better than
her 2017 results, and the 2024 election gave her National Rally party
37% of the popular vote. But recent history shows that without winning
an outright majority, right-wing parties in Western Europe will simply
not be allowed to govern.
European coalition politics and dysfunctional right-wing parties
which often make it impossible to form a government continue to cripple
any meaningful European response to the crisis.
Americaās strong executive branch and two-party system have their
pitfalls, but they also make it possible for someone like Trump (or,
vice versa Obama) to be elected and have free reign to make significant
changes over the course of four years. Thatās difficult to accomplish in
Europe where governments rise and fall, and can be brought down through
coalition and internal party backstabbing. If Trump had won an election
in Europe, he would have likely lasted six months before being brought
down in a palace coup. Most likely though, like Geert Wilders, he would
never have even been allowed to take office and make any changes in the
first place.
Israelās Prime Minister Netanyahu, who survived multiple rounds of
elections and coalition failures to become one of the countryās longest
serving prime ministers, shows that it is possible to remain in office,
but at the cost of constant political maneuverings and compromises with
coalition members that make it difficult to make any meaningful changes
in the country.
Parliamentary governments are meant to be fragile by design, but that
weakness has not made Europe more democratic, rather it has turned over
control of countries to unelected officials, lifetime bureaucrats
running ācaretakerā governments while the parties squabble, NGOs,
activist groups whose externally funded street riots can topple
government and the European Union.
And all of that may make it impossible for Europe to vote its way out of the Islamization crisis.
European voters have been slowly moving to the right as the pace of
Islamic terrorism continues to pick up. But the rising number of
terrorist attacks is only a symptom of the growing Islamization. The
same demographic processes that gifted Germany with 3 terrorist attacks
in 3 months and Austria with two terrorist plots in two weeks also
raises the power of Muslim voters.
After Geert Wilders called for āno more Morrocansā, the Netherlands
compromise ruling coalition, from which he was excluded, included a
Moroccan immigrant.
There are two arrows trending upward in Europe. One is growing voter
awareness while the other is rising Muslim demographics. The race
between those two arrows may determine whether Europe, formerly the
cradle of Western civilization, has a future.
Islamic terrorism serves the same function in Europe as it does
across the Middle East. The twin alternatives of Islamization by
āchoiceā or by force. Much of Europeās elite political class has chosen
Islamization by choice. Islamization by force is a reminder that choice
doesnāt enter into it.
In the UK, a man burned a Koran in front of the Turkish consulate.in
London. A Muslim man attacked him with a knife. The authorities arrested
both. They released the stabber on bail while the Koran burner was kept
locked up on charges of āintent to cause against the religious
institution of Islam.ā
That and the coverup of countless girls raped by Muslim sex grooming gangs is what Islamization by choice looks like.
Current numbers appear to show a lead for Nigel Farageās Reform
party, ahead of the mainline parties, for the first time, but Farage has
also made it clear that heās no longer opposed to Islamization. Reform
has received sizable funds from Muslim millionaire Zia Yusuf.
UK voters may want a change, but much like voters across Europe,
there is no easy way for the country that once prided itself on
democracy to vote its way out of an impending theocracy.
Voters may be ready, but politicians arenāt.