Rudyard Kipling"
āWhen you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldierā
General Douglas MacArthur"
āWe are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.ā
āIt is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.ā āOld soldiers never die; they just fade away.
āThe soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.ā
āMay God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .ā āThe object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
āNobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
āIt is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
Narratives clash in 'Mentega Terbang', Malay junk By Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Thursday, February 01, 2024
Malaysiakini : It attempts - again - to ignore the interconnectedness between the
various races and religions historically present in this land in favour
of a narrative that seeks to remind those who subscribe to it that Malay
culture and history exist in a vacuum.
A compelling story
The
film āMentega Terbangā attempts to find common ground behind the
various religious identities in this country. One work of art attempts
to satisfy feelings of insecurities and the other attempts to explore
the nature of religious commonality.
Now, I understand why some
people would take offence at this because what we are supposed to
discuss is how the educational establishment should sanction these
academics.
The reality is that what we are dealing with is the battle between two different narratives.
People
often forget that elections are won or lost based on how powerful the
narratives of opposing political parties are. What we are dealing with
here are narratives that shape not only how people relate to their
fellow citizens but how they vote.
The state claims that a film
like āMentega Terbangā hurts the feelings of a certain community. Of
course, the state does not care and should not get involved with the
Malay junk fiasco - that is for the university to decide - about the
narrative put forward by these two UPM academics. Why is that?
The
āMentega Terbangā narrative is a much more powerful narrative that the
state is worried people may view other religions and their adherents as
fellow travellers on the same journey.
Why do you think the state wanted a gag order on the filmmaker? Why
do you think that the state wants to ban the film? When people begin
questioning official narratives then people begin to think for
themselves.
Universiti Putra Malaysia
What these UPM academics did was merely further the cause of racial and religious superiority and to further entrench āketuananā (supremacy) principles.
Preeta
Samarasan wrote - āThis... is unbelievable. I knew something of the
audacity of our rewriters of history, but rewriting history for our
local textbooks is one thing, and rewriting it for international
academic journals that should be peer-reviewed is quite another.ā
Desensitisation
What āketuananā
narratives do is desensitise people who subscribe to any kind of
concept like ethics, integrity, and fidelity to principles other than
racial and religious dogma. This is about indoctrination, not
edification.
And really, the Malay ājunkā article would be right
at home in National Civics Bureau-type programmes. It reinforced
narratives that the Malay culture was as advanced as those ancient
cultures whose people inhabited āMalay landsā.
It assuages
feelings of insecurity when it comes to the expansiveness of Indian and
Chinese cultures. What we are talking about here is not education but
rather propaganda. We are not talking about history but myth creation.
And
this is why a work of fiction like āMentega Terbangā is so hurtful to
these people. It strips bare the lie that a specific society is immune
from questioning or doubt. It strips bare the lie that other religions
are a threat to the way of life of a specific community.
It is a narrative that challenges assumptions instead of enabling them.
The
Malay junk research paper comforts those who believe that Malay history
and culture are divorced from everything else in this country. It
enables certain people to take comfort in a fictional history of a land
that never was but which is claimed to be the sole province of the
Malays.
Malays are constantly told that they owe everything to the
non-Malays but what narratives like these hope to achieve is a
foundation of independence beyond the messy communal relationships both
economic and cultural that the āpendatangā (immigrants) bring to the table.
What āketuananismā
has done especially when it comes to the arts is to destroy anything
that references a diverse Malay culture from the political landscape and
replace art and history with mythological narratives of a people who
never were.
Orwell said: āWho controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.ā