Rudyard Kipling"
āWhen you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldierā
General Douglas MacArthur"
āWe are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.ā
āIt is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.ā āOld soldiers never die; they just fade away.
āThe soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.ā
āMay God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .ā āThe object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
āNobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
āIt is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
What new operating system is Harapan offering? - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Thursday, October 29, 2020
Malaysiakini : āDemocracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.ā - US author James Bovard
COMMENT
| What the recently failed half-past-six emergency declaration has
demonstrated is that the Malay political establishment is in total
disarray. The fact that Muhyiddin Yassin loyalists - from the diverse
political parties that make up PN or whatever it is called - are calling
for ceasefire and cooperation indicates that the gang from the Sheraton
Move are in trouble. This means Malaysia is in trouble.
All
over the world, political systems and institutions are going through
the wringer because what this Covid-19 pandemic is doing is ruthlessly
pointing out the flaws in systems of governance. This could have been a
time of reset and a reshaping of priorities, but here in Malaysia, we
continue to meander and have become numb to the antics of the political
class.
DAP senator Liew Chin Tong
thinks that Malaysia needs a new operating system (OS), but what he
considers a new reality that requires a new OS ā a divided electorate,
coalition building and bipartisanship ā are merely baseline features of
messy democracies all over the world.
The real issue here in
Malaysia is that we have never got over our original sin of race and
religion. The fact that the two biggest parties, in terms of
representation and voter share, cannot find common ground because both
sides use race and religion (in their own ways) to gin up their
respective base, indicates that this country will never move forward. Rickety
dink Malay uber alles formations will attempt to control the political
narrative for the near future until Malaysia slips into a truly
theocratic state.
I despise it when the partisans talk about
āprinciplesā as a means to circumvent the realpolitik discourse and
castigate personalities when there is ample evidence that āprinciplesā
were never an issue when it came to chasing political power in this
country.
Some
folks clutch their pearls when they hear about PKR president Anwar
Ibrahim possibly working with former prime minister Najib Abdul Razak
and I roll my eyes because the electorate certainly had no problems
voting in alleged kleptocrats and serial abusers of public trusts for
decades.
Maybe Anwar and his newfound buddies can come up with
some sort of truth and reconciliation tribunal, where all the kleptos
can return monies stolen and make some sort of religious mea culpa. Then
political operatives can breathe a sigh of relief because stealing
money from public coffers, dismantling public institutions,
race-baiting, and jailing opponents are things that the rakyat can and
have got behind.
Racial and religious issues that divide the
country are systemic. The same goes for corruption. It is pointless
targeting individuals, although it has political advantages. The
opposition, at least the non-Malay opposition, has claimed that the
issues are systemic, and the major part of the problem is race-based
political hegemony that seeks to sustain such systems.
What I want
to know ā and maybe you do too ā is how does the non-Malay uber alles
crowd not spook the Malays? Does stating clearly that the opposition is a
secular and egalitarian opposition make the situation better or worse?
Or is it better doubling or sometimes tripling religious funds, mucking
about in religious spaces of the majority in demonstrations of kumbaya, do more damage?
Liew
has publicly admitted that Pakatan Harapan and, I suppose, the DAP, did
everything that Muhyiddin wanted or needed. The DAP played by the rules
ā unfair though it may have been ā and let down its base when it came
to various hot button issues, and yet this was not enough for the gang
from Sheraton and even Malay power structures in Harapan. Remember
how Harapan had all these select committees, which turned out to be
impotent bodies waiting for the old maverick to tell them what their
purview was? Or how about all those supposed bipartisan initiatives that
never materialised?
These are not āgotchaā questions. I really
want to know. Forget all these fancy talks about principles and new
operating systems. I used to be one of those people who thought that the
DAP and PKR would be hewing the secular and egalitarian line as best as
possible when it came to differentiating themselves from the political
and social contract of BN regimes.
Since we have never really had
that and no one in the political apparatus of Harapan is interested in
such things, how does Harapan move forward? All these legacy coalitions,
which are actually a facsimile of the BN formula, have caused too many
problems for the DAP and multiracial parties. Lim Guan Engās statement
that the DAP is willing to work with anyone on the issue of loan
moratorium extension is a good start
Which
is why someone as smart as Tony Pua should not be making statements
that a Najib-backed government can go to hell. If a government goes to
hell, so do the people it is supposed to govern. Not to mention, it
makes it difficult to work with demonised political operatives for a
utilitarian good.
This is why Umno demonising the DAP has always
been a dumb political play, because you are essentially demonising a
large section of the voting public whom you need to support policies
that benefit the greatest number. Harapan (specifically the DAP)
has to figure out how to get out of its 'damned if we do and damned if
we donāt' cycle of their own making.
Small steps like a willingness to work with anyone on specific issues is perhaps the way out of this mess.