Jihad Watch : Tucked away in the southern Transcaucasian highlands, which is the
very headwaters of the Middle East, is a small country by the name of
Armenia which parallels the history of Israel in many surprising,
striking ways. Armenians have inhabited this area of the world for
thousands of years. They even claim Noahās heritage as the famed Mt.
Ararat dominates the skyline of Armeniaās capital, Yerevan.
In the first century B.C., the kingdom of Armenia set aside the
Seleucid empire which had caused so much trouble to the small nation of
Judea just to the south for well over 100 years. At this time, Armenia
ruled from the Caspian to the Mediterranean until Rome squeezed them out
of Syria or Cilicia in the 60s B.C. Later, Augustus Caesar used Armenia
as a buffer state. It was the emperor Trajan who finally absorbed
Armenia into the Roman Empire (114 A.D). A decade before Constantine
took up the banner of the cross, Armenia became the first Christian
nation in the world.
Though Armenian Christianity had some key theological differences
with Eastern Orthodoxy, the Armenians flourished under Byzantium.
However, they began to suffer at the hands of Islam during the crusades.
After the conquest of Constantinople in 1453, Armenia had been under
Islamic hegemony ever since ā until the Ottoman Empire, along with its
German ally, i.e., the Second Reich (1871-1918), collapsed in the
aftermath of World War I.
The map above is an old German ethno-geographic map depicting the
presumed racial distribution of Europe and the Middle East at the outset
of the Great War (1914-18). The publishing of this map reflects
Friedrich Ratzelās (1844-1904) blending of social Darwinism with what he called anthrogeographie.
Ratzel viewed history as a biological theater of evolutionary
geopolitics where the various races expand outward looking for
geographical living space ā all of which reflects the eugenic health of
the nation. This blending later became more infamously known as lebensraum,
or āliving space,ā through the rise of National Socialism, with no
small thanks to the likes of Karl Haushofer (1869-1946) and Nazi deputy FĆ¼hrer Rudolf Hess (1894-1987), who helped convert Ratzelās anthrogeography into Mein Kampf
ā which Hitler wrote while in prison for rioting on the streets of
Berlin in 1923. Hitler argued for the racial struggle of the Aryan
victims against the backdrop of what he claimed was the unjust Treaty of
Versailles and the international cabal behind it all, which he said was
largely corrupted by Jewish communists and capitalists.
Closely connected to this was the fact that the Nazis were well aware
of the Armenian genocide, which was perpetrated by the Ottoman Turks
during the Great War. In 1915, at least 1.5 million Armenians were
annihilated from what is today eastern Turkey in a racial cleansing
operation of genocidal proportions. This was on top of previous and
subsequent massacres of Armenians that sporadically occurred 20-30 years
before the war. As the Ottoman empire was contracting, shrinking, and
weakening during this time, it began to take out its frustrations
against its own inhabitants. The Armenians were singled out as back
stabbers, recalcitrant malcontents, and rebels whose shady business
practices were highway robbery. Perhaps most shocking, it was the Young
Turks, the presumed so-called moderate Muslims of the day, who carried
out the Armenian genocide. However, the progressivism of the Young Turks
was connected to European and German āscientificā social Darwinism and
its geopolitical doctrines.
Indeed, the lower left part of the map highlighted directly above
shows a big blue āproblemā in what is called Armenia today. It stood
directly in the way of the Ottoman Empireās Pan-Turkish plans for the
upper Middle East. It was during the Great War that the western
blue-striped side of Armenia was completely wiped out during the
Armenian genocide. However, at the very close of the Great War in 1918,
with the Ottoman Empire in a freefall, the Armenians themselves had two
decisive victories against the Turks at Sardarapat and Aparan,
which saved them from further annihilation. While the Turks have not
been back since, they still have Pan-Turkish plans to go from the
Mediterranean all the way to Baku, Azerbaijan.
Before, during and after the war, the German press, media, and books
routinely characterized the Armenians as a lower race like the Jews,
vultures with crooked noses, usurers, money grubbers, and traitors who
were directly responsible for making the Ottoman Empire sick from a
eugenic point of view. Before Israel gained its own national
independence in 1948, the Germans called the Armenians āthe Jews of the
Orient.ā This allowed the press, media, and culture of the Second Reich ā
all of which was largely buoyed at that time by the anti-Semitic social
progressivism of German Theological Liberalism, which was based on natural theology rather
than the Bible, to ignore the plight of Armenian Christians. Scientific
racism, instead of leading to progress, thus evolved into justifying a
āKaiser Jihadā instead.
After the war, when the very perpetrator of the genocide, Talat Pasha
(1874-1921), was assassinated by an Armenian in Berlin, the ensuing
trial became national headlines. All of Germany thus became exposed to
the true horrors of the Armenian Genocide ā savagery that was especially
macabre toward women in particular. Initially, Germans were sympathetic
to the Armenians, but subsequently after the German Press went to work,
the genocide was largely justified within a few years no matter how
brutal it may have all been.
The Nazis were very impressed with the cleansing of the Armenians
from the Turkish landscape as a new and pure Turkey was born after the
Allies redrew the maps of the Middle East. The Armenian genocide thus
became a geopolitical genocidal template of sorts for the Holocaust.
Even the very word āgenocideā itself largely comes from the German word āvolkermord,ā
which literally means āmurder of an ethnic raceā that is not only
deeply imbued with social Darwinism, but was also used in descriptions
connected to the Armenian massacres of the 1890ās and following. Other
phrases and terms such as ātotal annihilationā or āfinal goalā or
āsolutionā to the Armenian problem/question(s) were also used. The Final
Solution was thus presaged in the literature connected to the Armenian
Genocide.
Both the Armenian Genocide and the Jewish Holocaust are historical
tragedies which prejudicially reflect the very anti Judeo-Christian
sentiments of the 20th century, which continue unabated
today. While Armenia and Israel did become independent nations after
their respective genocides during the tumult of two world wars, yet
because of all the carnage and suffering, they both have significant
populations outside their own countries, known as their ādiasporas.ā Both Armenia and Israel were also subjugated to smaller pieces of real estate every time the territorial maps were redrawn.
Indeed, in the early 1920ās, after Armenia had received independence
from the Ottoman empire with international backing, Stalin handed over
an area called the Nagorno-Karabakh of the Armenian highlands to a
brand-new country that never existed before called Azerbaijan ā which
led to killings and constant repression of the Armenians living there.
Stalin probably did so because his rise in communism largely began
in Baku (1907-09), where he defended the labor movement, fomented
revolution, and shook down British and Tsarist conglomerates in the rich
oil fields developing there. Moreover, Stalin hated religion. He
undoubtedly wanted to keep both the Christians and Muslims off balance
and against each other so that the Soviets could easily divide, conquer,
and rule over both.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Armenians and
Azerbaijanis unsurprisingly went to war in the early 1990s over the
Nagorno-Karabakh, with Azerbaijan wanting to maintain what Stalin gave
them. All the while, the Armenians knew it would be a disaster for them
if such was/is the case, in which an independent Muslim country will
dominate their lives without the iron fist of the Soviet Union to serve
as a buffer between them. While occasional flareups have been routine
since that time, it all suddenly become far more serious as Azerbaijan,
under Turkeyās direction, broke the ceasefire agreement dating back to
1994 with the biggest attack yet seen since that time. With Armeniaās
survival at stake, together with Turkeyās refusal to admit its genocidal
past, the recipe for another disaster is very real.
Azerbaijan has three to four times the population of Armenia. Their
strong ally, Turkey, has more than 80 million people. Armenia has
perhaps three million people. Armenia is a poor, land-locked country
sandwiched in between them both. The math is not good, and the odds are
even worse. Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia are both presently under
martial law, as the COVID crisis has now been replaced by something far
more dangerous ā a real war in the very heart of the upper Middle East.
In 1939, Hitler allegedly said of the Armenians from his Bavarian
alpine chalet, āWho, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the
Armenians?ā Both Azerbaijan and Turkey are counting on the exact same
sentiments at a time when the western elites are all hiding behind their
COVID masks. Too many people approach this problem from the standpoint
of either globalists or isolationists. Neither approach is correct.