Rudyard Kipling"
“When you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldier”
General Douglas MacArthur"
“We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.”
“It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.” “Old soldiers never die; they just fade away.
“The soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.”
“May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .” “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
“Nobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
“It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
A white feather for MCA By Commander (Rtd) S THAYAPARAN Royal Malaysian Navy
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
Malaysiakini : “Cowardice rightly understood begins with selfishness and ends with shame.”
- José Rizal, ‘Noli Me Tángere’
Captain Ron Radcliffe Naval Attache USN, 1st Admiral Thiruchandran and wife, Ms Maureen and Commander
COMMENT | The spat between the
MCA’s Ti Lian Ker and Umno’s Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz is not about the
disparity of power between the component parties of BN but rather the
continuing existential crisis of the MCA that it has been unable to
overcome since losing the support of the Chinese community.Whereas the MIC has accepted its role as the water boy to Umno, the
MCA desperately attempts relevance in a turbulent time of ‘Melayu’
political upheaval.
There has always been a disparity of power within BN. However, parity
of power was never the currency between the MCA plutocrats and Umno
potentates who shaped the national agenda and serviced the gravy train
that enabled this country to remain in relative functionality for
decades. These schemers were aided by a polity willing to subscribe to
the so-called social contract as long as people could pursue their
economic agendas and live in relative harmony.
Ti’s contention that BN playing the ‘jaguh kampung’
(village champion) was causing BN to lose cosmopolitan votes is the
kind of pussy footing that that seems to be the only stratagems that the
MCA these days is capable of coming up with. I hope Pakatan supporters
are not naïve enough to think that there is no nexus of connections
between MCA plutocrats and DAP operatives working together for mutual
benefit which goes far beyond political profit. The same applies to Umno
and its so-called political enemies.
First off BN is not playing the ‘jaguh kampung’, Umno is in a ‘fight
to the death’ struggle with Najib refuseniks and is attempting to keep
their rural voting bases safe from the clutches of a newly revitalised
Malay power groups. The reality is that the rural demographic in the
Peninsular and Umno’s vote banks in Sabah and Sarawak are holding BN
together, and this is because of Umno and not because of BN.
The reality is that unofficially Umno has given up on urban voters
and it is the responsibility of MCA to shore up support and make the
case for Umno and not BN. I am sure the MCA operative is aware that
there are many Umno-elected officials who do not support Najib but are
only interested in their political survival that translates to Umno’s
survival.
After getting a spanking from Nazri, like a chastised child the MCA
central committee member claims, "Now that the ultra-Malays who
destroyed Tunku Abdul Rahman's Alliance are out of BN and in Parti
Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (Bersatu), BN leadership must seize this
opportunity to navigate BN to its rightful 1Malaysia course or the
spirit of the Alliance’s founding years of Tunku Abdul Rahman," which is
again horse manure disguised as a mea culpa.
The thing that’s destroying MCA
The contradiction is obvious. First Ti claims that Umno’s continued
use of Malay nationalism for the support of rural voters is destroying
BN’s chances in the urban areas, and then he paradoxically claims that
with the ejection of so-called “ultra-Malays” from the parties - the
very ones who reject the Najib regime - things could get back to normal. The problem is that the so-called ultra-Malays are the ones in charge of Umno now. Moreover, I do not mean people like Nazri (photo)
who has had run-ins with the ultra-Malay component of Umno, but I am
sure would rather be attacking the Najib refuseniks than trading shots
with a so-called “partner”.
This is the problem with throwing in with Umno, the very basis of
power-sharing is based on communal preoccupations that either conflicts
with each other or are manipulated to appeal to the lowest common
denominator.
If you want to survive in the game, then you have to spin racists’
rhetoric for your partners but most importantly, have the support of the
community you claim to represent. This is why Nazri has it both ways.
This is why he gets to play the realpolitik card against the MCA
operative, alluding to the former’s desire for political rejuvenation
and the slim chance of it because of the lack of his community’s support
and at the same time slay Umno/Malay sacred cows.
And therein lies the problem. How does a race-based party operate
when it has lost the majoritarian support of the community it claims to
represent? How does a race-based party offer dissent or advice when it
has to rely on the benefice of Umno to remain politically relevant? How
does a race-based party counter the supposedly race-blind propaganda of
the opposition when it does not have the support it needs to offer a
counter-narrative because the community it supposedly represents has
abandoned it?
As I wrote in ‘MCA’s long day’s journey into night’,
“What is really destroying the MCA is not the propaganda of the DAP but
the acceptance by a large voting demographic of the Chinese community
that no representation in the government is better than MCA
representation.”
In addition, this is not the first time Ti has stirred the pot. Some
time back, Ti made the claim that the federal constitution was not inherently racist but those with racist intent manipulated its provisions. I actually thought that MCA was on to something and singled out Ti, writing,
“However, the MCA political operative did show some cojones when he
said ‘we can consider amending or ratifying our constitution to free
ourselves of racism’ but of course, he qualified this with the most
overused, disingenuous, servile and obnoxious Malaysian excuse of ‘come a
day when we are there - a matured and democratic nation’.”
However, Ti made the same nostalgic claim when he talked about bridge
building and ‘Alliance’ cooperation when he correctly pointed out that
the constitution needed to be amended, in his own waffling way. He makes
the same claim in this mea culpa, alluding to the halcyon days of
Alliance politics.
But as I quoted from Mavis Puthucheary’s article, ‘Malaysia's Social
Contract - Exposing the Myth Behind the Slogan’: "In the first 10 years
after Independence, the balance of power between the two main parties,
Umno and the MCA, was more or less equal. After 1969, however, the
balance of power within the ruling coalition shifted significantly in
favour of Umno and the political system itself became less democratic.
“Although both parties fared badly in the 1969 elections, Umno
leaders who had secured control of the government concentrated their
efforts on regaining Malay support while still maintaining the
power-sharing structure.”
In other words, for BN there is no going back. Unfortunately for MCA,
this new alliance spearheaded by the powerbrokers in Pakatan Harapan
and the Najib refuseniks is the closest things we will get to the flawed
Alliance strategy of yore.
The MCA’s sin is that it does not have the courage either to support its partner, Umno, or leave BN.