Rudyard Kipling"
āWhen you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldierā
General Douglas MacArthur"
āWe are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.ā
āIt is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.ā āOld soldiers never die; they just fade away.
āThe soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.ā
āMay God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .ā āThe object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
āNobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
āIt is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
Can we balance love and hatred for dogs? By Andrew Sia
Tuesday, August 04, 2026
Malaysiakini : MBDK counterclaimed that the woman owner had āacted aggressivelyā
when trying to cut the noose around her dogās neck. Her actions made it
ādifficultā for council officers to loosen the rope āfor the sake of the
animalās safetyā, said MBDK.
Iām sorry, but this sounds like damage control, especially the part about āanimal safetyā. Itās akin to āblaming the victimā.
What
complicated matters is that many residents were allowed to join the
operation. When such a crowd goes round a housing area hunting dogs,
some overzealous men can turn an orderly operation into an angry mob.
How could MBDK control the crowd?
Some were enraged, claiming Rocky had bitten somebody. But the lady owner avowed that her pet had never bitten anyone before.
āWe raised him since he was small and he was part of our family. He didn't deserve to die like this,ā she said.
A video
of the incident shared by Charles shows the woman owner begging a
shouting group of men to release Rocky. They clearly had more numbers
and power than the lady.
Would she have dared to āact
aggressivelyā, as claimed by MBDK? Is it more likely that she was simply
desperate to save her beloved pet when trying to cut the noose?
Two-Malaysia divide
Conversely,
many Malays point to dogs biting people. These have included attacks by
fierce breeds such as Rottweilers and German Shepherds.
A man walking his Rottweilers in April 2025 in Baling, Kedah
Although I love dogs, punishment is needed when pets injure others.
But
itās more fuzzy when stray dogs with no owners attack others. One side
says that unlike fierce breeds, street canines usually donāt bite people
- unless they are provoked.
The other side says all strays are
dangerous and must be hunted down mercilessly. This encourages boys to
throw rocks at dogs, as some deem them ābinatang kotorā (unclean animals). But dogs can detect hatred and may react in self-defence.
Yet
many other animals are deemed āuncleanā, including carnivores with
fangs (lions, what about cats?), birds with talons (eagles) and also
reptiles (lizards, iguanas).
Yet they donāt evoke the same hatred as dogs. Is it because canines are bred by non-Malays?
And not all dogs bite; some just bark. But some people on motorbikes panic and end up crashing as a result.
This
happened at Taman Teluk Gedung Indah in Port Klang, when a youth was
allegedly chased by several dogs. He lost control of his bike at a road
bump and then crashed.
He
injured his head and went into a coma, but has since recovered. The
photo of him on a hospital bed went viral and seemed to be the trigger
that sparked the vengeful mob.
Somehow, this was twisted into claims that Rocky had bitten someone.
But
running triggers a dogās natural instinct to chase you. As a teen, I
once tried to outrun a barking dog on my bicycle and then fell.
The dog caught up with me but didnāt bite - my bruises were caused by my own panic. I never repeated that mistake.
The
correct response is to stop, get off the vehicle, then look calmly at
any aggressive dogs - with compassion if possible - and they will back
down. Thatās how Iāve dealt with growling street dogs around the world
without any problems.
Apart
from freaking out, perhaps the motorcyclist didnāt wear a helmet. Is
that how he injured his head badly after falling? Dog haters may hurl
abuse at me, but letās be honest and objective about what probably
happened.
Compassion in Islam?
Itās
disturbing that the crowd was still aggressive even though the lady was
on her knees, wailing and begging for Rockyās life. Even if the dog had
no licence, surely some compassion could have been shown?
Islam
teaches kindness. Muslims say āBismillahā every day, invoking the name
of the Most Gracious and Most Merciful God. But no quarter was shown to
Rocky.
Were people with a āketuananā mindset bullying an Indian
lady? If the dog was owned by a Mat Salleh, would they have behaved the
same way?
Selangorās Tengku Permaisuri Norashikin expressed deep
sadness and anger over recent incidents of cruelty towards pets and
stray animals.
Amazingly, this was the fifth time Her Majesty had
spoken up about local councils in Selangor mistreating dogs, including
in Banting, Shah Alam, and now MBDK. Surely a āroyalā body should have
higher standards?
Tengku Permaisuri Norashikin
I
see this as a failure of the Pakatan Harapan state government, which
controls Selangor local councils. We need elections for them to ensure
they listen more to residents.
They should do this last good deed before they lose the next elections to the BN-PAS Malay wave.
Sadly, the royal reminder didnāt stop Malays from hurling dog hatred online and even insults against Her Majesty.
One comment went ā when it comes to the pets of ābangsa asingā (foreign races), everybody makes noise, but when our children are bitten, all are quiet. One abusive fellow wrote, āPi mampus la, anjing dah gigit org (go and die, the dog bit someone)ā.
Another
netizen accused Her Majesty of ātalking too muchā because the āChinese
were upsetā. Another joker slammed her as an elite āT20 personā who
didnāt understand reality.
If non-Malays had said similar things, they would have been quickly traced and arrested for insulting royalty.
Several
Malays blamed the Indian lady for the dogās death. Others shifted the
topic to drunk drivers, the Carlsberg factory in Shah Alam, and even the
death of fire and rescue personnel Adib Kassim during a riot. Anything
to justify their prejudice.
Muar MP Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman
posted on Facebook that the threat from a few dogs cannot be used to
justify another injustice.
A mob mentality of online bullying seems prevalent. Did the dog hunting āvolunteersā in Port Klang have a similar mindset?
Is
this sense of racial grievance and victimhood due to political
fearmongering? And provocations by cyber troopers that the Malays are
āunder threatā?
Fair compromise solutions
Three
probes into the Rocky killing by the police, Veterinary Services, and
the Housing and Local Government Ministry have been announced.
Amid this heated racially-coloured debate, we need calm, clear heads to find fair, compromise solutions.
1)
Responsible pet ownership means keeping dogs on a leash outside the
house. Local councils should follow the humane trap-neuter-release
approach of the Penang Island City Council (MBPP) to control strays.
Tengku Permaisuri Norashikin advocated this in 2024. Itās also done in the Muslim city of Istanbul. Yet Selangor local councils have ignored this. Why?
2)
What about cats? I once had a neighbour with eight cats that kept
invading my garden to deposit their stinking poop. Nobody compensated me
for this nuisance and source of disease.
The dog haters should ask if people can go around catching or poisoning cats? If not, why is cruelty against dogs allowed?
3) Education is crucial. Bukit Bendera MP Syerleena Abdul Rashid said Islam doesnāt support cruelty towards dogs, but instead calls for compassion.
The correct ways to deal with stray dogs, as mentioned earlier, should be spread online too.
4)
Any dog catching operations must be limited to council officers, not
āvolunteersā who may become vigilantes. Offering money to catch strays,
as done in Shah Alam in 2024, only encourages more cruelty.
Some
may even catch licensed dogs for the money. High redemption fees to
release captured dogs are a blatant attempt to tax dog lovers. Itās
probably more useful to offer money to catch litterbugs, dirty eateries,
and corrupt officials.
Sadly, the killing of Rocky has become a racial issue and exposed how Malaysian society is āretak menanti belahā (cracked and waiting to be split open). We canāt go on this way.