Link graphic for a KJB version Bible Verse that will be automatically updated when we update it from time to time

Articles, Opinions & Views: Islamic Conquest Of India - The Bloodiest In History

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Fighting Seventh
The Fighting Rangers
On War, Politics
and Burning Issues

American Thinker
Newspapers Online

Arab News
Asia News
Asia Times
Assyrian News
BBC News
Breitbart News
British and
Newspapers Online

CBS News
City Journal
Christian Solidarity

Daily Caller
Daily Mail
DAP Malaysia
Drudge Report
Dutch News
Faith Freedom
Ali Sina

Foreign Affairs
Fox News
Google News
Harakah Daily

Herald Malaysia
Hurriyet Turkey
History of Jihad
Indian Newspapers

Inspire Magazine
Herald Tribune

Jerusalem Newswire
Jihad Watch
French News
In English)

London Times

Malaysian Insider
Centre for Policy

Free Malaysia Today
Malaysia Chronicle
-Sarawak Report

Middle East

Mission Network

National Review
New York Post
New York Times
Nut Graph
Opinion Journal
Right Wing News
Star Online
Straits Times
Sun Malaysia
Morning Herald

The Malay Mail
The Rebel Media
The Sun (UK)
Times of India
Town Hall
US News
World Report

USA Today
Washington Post
Washington Times
World Net Daily
Watch Monitor

Yahoo News
Ynet News

No Atheists
In A Foxhole

Rudyard Kipling

" ā€œWhen you're left wounded on
Afganistan's plains and

the women come out to cut up what remains,
Just roll to your rifle

and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldierā€
General Douglas MacArthur

" ā€œWe are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.ā€

ā€œIt is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.ā€
ā€œOld soldiers never die; they just fade away.
ā€œThe soldier, above all other people, prays for peace,
for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.ā€
ā€œMay God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .ā€
ā€œThe object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.

ā€œNobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
ā€œIt is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died.
Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."

Proud To Have
Served With Warriors

Malaysian Food
Foreign Bloggers
Other Stuff

Major D Swami
WITH Lt Col Ivan Lee
Click Here

Lt Col Ivan Lee
you want him with
you in a firefight!!!!

Dying Warrior
Fighting Vehicles
Bujang Senang
Click Here
The A Team
Click Here
Major General
Toh Choon Siang
Click here
Lieutenant General
Stephen Mundaw
Click Here
With His
Dying Breath
Killed in Battle
In Death
Last Thoughts
Before Battle
Whilst There Is
Life, There Is Fight

Not Done In Yet!!

Iban Trackers
Facts On RoP
Hutang Negara
Islamic Conquest Of India - The Bloodiest In History
Sunday, February 11, 2024

The Greatest Genocide In History Muslim historian Firishta [full name Muhammad Qasim Hindu Shah, born in 1560 and died in 1620], the author of the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim, was the first to give an idea to the medieval bloodbath that was India during Muslim rule, when he declared that over 400 million Hindus got slaughtered during Muslim invasion and occupation of India.

Survivors got enslaved and castrated. Indiaā€™s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion. By the mid 1500ā€™s the Hindu population was 200 million. By the time the British arrived to the shores of India and after centuries of Islamic law ruling India, the Hindu population was not behaving like their normal self; they were behaving like Muslims.

Mongol (Mughal) India

There are many witness reports from the British archives of horrendous Hindu incidents that were shocking in cruelty to the British ā€“ and they therefore sometimes referred to the people as ā€œsavagesā€. Yes, anyone who gets ontaminated by the association with Islamic ā€˜cultureā€™ truly gets tainted and savaged. That is exactly why it is so detrimental and dangerous.

Islamic Conquest Of India - The Bloodiest By Will Durant

Today, like other cultures with a soul massacred by Islam, India is not truly a Hindu nation. India is a shadow of Islam, a Hindufied version of Islam, where every human atrocity has been emulated and adopted into a culture previously alien to such brutality. And in association with itā€™s foreign mohamedan pest, these Islamic habits have become adopted and accepted as a ā€œnormalā€ part of Indian culture.

But if we look at pre-Islamic Indian culture it was a in general a benevolent culture of knowledge and learning, much more so than it is today. From the time of the Umayyad Dynasty (711AD) to the last Mughal, Bahadur Shah Zafar (1858), so widely praised as great leaders by Indian historians themselves, entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves.

Will Durant on the Islamic conquest of India, explained by Indian historian Vikram Sampath

Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation opulation; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. ā€œHindu slaughter.ā€ The_Mughal_Empire The Mughal Empireā€™s spread and occupation of India. The genocide suffered by the Hindus and Sikhs of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognised by the World.

Hindu Genocide

The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis. The holocaust of the Hindus in India was of even greater proportions, the only difference was that it continued for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the Punjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in the late 1700ā€™s. We have elaborate literary evidence of the Worldā€™s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary eyewitness accounts.

The historians and biographers of the invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-to-day encounters with Indiaā€™s Hindus These contemporary records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were committed ā€“ and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus, mass rapes of Hindu women and the destruction of thousands of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been well documented and provide solid proof of the Worldā€™s biggest holocaust.

Dr. Koenraad Elst in his article ā€œWas There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?ā€ states: ā€œThere is no official estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam. A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust.

Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty. The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526).ā€

He also writes in his book ā€œNegation in Indiaā€: ā€œThe Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls.

Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter.ā€ Will Durant argued in his 1935 book ā€œThe Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritageā€ (page 459): ā€œThe Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD.

Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period.ā€ Francois Gautier in his book ā€˜Rewriting Indian Historyā€™ (1996) wrote: ā€œThe massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese.ā€

Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilisations (1995), that Islamic rule in India as a ā€œcolonial experimentā€ was ā€œextremely violentā€, and ā€œthe Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm ā€“ burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques.

On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves.ā€ Alain Danielou in his book, Histoire de lā€™ Inde writes: ā€œFrom the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions.

It is, as usual, in the name of ā€˜a holy warā€™ of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races.ā€ Irfan Husain in his article ā€œDemons from the Pastā€ observes: ā€œWhile historical events should be judged in the context of their times, it cannot be denied that even in that bloody period of history, no mercy was shown to the Hindus unfortunate enough to be in the path of either the Arab conquerors of Sindh and south Punjab, or the Central Asians who swept in from Afghanistanā€¦

The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed some dreadful crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban, Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster.

ā€œTheir temples were razed, their idols smashed, their women raped, their men killed or taken slaves. When Mahmud of Ghazni entered Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered all 50,000 inhabitants. Aibak killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands. The list of horrors is long and painful. These conquerors justified their deeds by claiming it was their religious duty to smite non-believers.

Cloaking themselves in the banner of Islam, they claimed they were fighting for their faith when, in reality, they were indulging in straightforward slaughter and pillageā€¦ā€ Islam in India: The Afghan ruler Mahmud al-Ghazni invaded India no less than seventeen times between 1001 ā€“ 1026 AD. The book ā€˜Tarikh-i-Yaminiā€™ ā€“ written by his secretary documents several episodes of his bloody military campaigns :

ā€œThe blood of the infidels flowed so copiously [at the Indian city of Thanesar] that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink itā€¦the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming riverā€¦but many of them were slain, taken or drownedā€¦ Nearly fifty thousand men were killed.ā€ In the contemporary record ā€“ ā€˜ Taj-ul-Maā€™asirā€™ by Hassn Nizam-i-Naishapuri, it is stated that when Qutb-ul- Din Aibak (of Turko ā€“ Afghan origin and the First Sultan of Delhi 1194-1210 AD) conquered Meerat, he demolished all the Hindu temples of the city and erected mosques on their sites.

In the city of Aligarh, he converted Hindu inhabitants to Islam by the sword and beheaded all those who adhered to their own religion. The Persian historian Wassaf writes in his book ā€˜Tazjiyat-ul-Amsar wa Tajriyat ul Asarā€™ that when the Alaul-Din Khilji (An Afghan of Turkish origin and second ruler of the Khilji Dynasty in India 1295-1316 AD) captured the city of Kambayat at the head of the gulf of Cambay, he killed the adult male Hindu inhabitants for the glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, sent the women of the country with all their gold, silver, and jewels, to his own home, and made about twentv thousand Hindu maidens his private slaves.

India has a deep, long cultural history. Hinduism began there around 1,500 BC and Buddhism around the 6th century BC. This culture had evolved impressive intellectual, religious and artistic pursuits. Pre and post the early days of Islam, Indian scholars took their works in science, maths (zero, algebra, geometry, the decimal system, so-called ā€˜Arabicā€™ numbers are actually Hindu ones!), medicine, philosophy etc to the courts of others (including Muslims eg Baghdad).

Others came to study in Indiaā€™s established universities. Indian children (boys and girls) were educated in the relatively widespread education system in a wide variety of subjects eg science, medicine and philosophy. Indiaā€™s art and architecture was magnificent. They were a prosperous people. Then came Islam ā€“ slaughter, slavery, rape, violence, pillage; destruction of religious sites, art and architecture; poverty, exploitation, humiliation, famine, forced conversion, decline in intellectual pursuits, social destruction and a worsening of social ills.

To Islam, anything that is not Islamic is from a time of ignorance ā€“Jahiliyya- and must be destroyed (or appropriated and called Islamā€™s!). The onslaught created the Roma (gypsies), destroyed ā€˜Hinduā€™ Afghanistan and formed Pakistan (Kashmir) and Bangladesh . The cost of the Muslim invasions is massive in lives, wealth and culture. Estimates suggest that 60-80 MILLION died at the hands of Muslim invaders and rulers between 1000 and 1525 alone (ie over 500 years-the population FELL). (Lal cited in Khan p 216) Impossible you think?

In the war of Independence of Bangladesh, 1971, the Muslim Pakistani army killed 1.5-3 million people (mainly Muslims ā€¦) in just 9 MONTHS. (Khan p 216). The world looked the other wayā€”but donā€™t we always when itā€™s Muslims committing the violence! [*The actual number of Hindus brutally slaughtered by Muslims were around 400 million, not 60-80 million, according to Firishta [1560-1620], the author of the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim].

Based on the figures that are available, the number of Indians enslaved is enormous! The Muslim conquest of India was probably the bloodiest in history: The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with utmost glee and pride of the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave-markets, and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800AD to 1700 AD.

Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by the sword in this periodā€ (historian Durant cited in Khan p 201) And Rizwan Salim (1997) writes what the Arab invaders really did: ā€˜ savages at a very low level of civilisation and no culture worth the name, from Arabia and West Asia, began entering India from the early century onwards.

Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and idols, plundered innumerable forts and palaces of Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women. ā€¦ā€¦ā€¦but many Indians do not seem to recognize that the alien Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution of the earthā€™s most mentally advanced civilisation, the most richly imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative society.ā€ (cited in Khan p 179)

Of course Indians pre-Islam, fought, but it was NOT the practice to enslave or ravage, or massacre, or destroy religious sites, or damage crops and farmers. Battles were usually conducted on open soil between military personnel. (Khan p 205-207) There was no concept of ā€˜bootyā€™ so Indians were unprepared for Islamā€™s onslaught. Indigenous Indians were forced to flee to jungles and mountains, or face gruelling exploitation and taxes, slaughter or enslavement while their society was demeaned and destroyed.

Muslims constantly attacked the indigenous, idolatrous population and also fought against each other in ceaseless revolts by generals, chiefs and princes during the entire time of Islamic rule (Khan p 205). Slavery: Initially ā€˜Indiaā€™ included part of todayā€™s Pakistan (Sindh), Bangladesh/Bengal and Kashmir. Hinduism and Buddhism flourished in Afghanistan pre the Islamic takeover (7th century).

In the 16th century Afghanistan was divided between the Muslim Mogul (Mughal) Empire of India and the Safavids of Persia. Initially the godless Umayyads, allowed Hindus dhimmi status ā€“ possibly because of their large numbers, resistance to Islam and their value as a source of tax income. This violates Islamic text and law which demands death or conversion for idolaters and polytheists.

When Sultan Iltutmish (d 1236) was asked why Hindus werenā€™t given the choice between death and Islam, he replied: ā€œbut at the moment in Indiaā€¦the Muslims are so few that they are like salt (in a large dish) ā€¦however after a few years when in the capital and the regions and all the small towns, when the Muslims are well established and the troops are largerā€¦.it would be possible to give Hindus the choice of death or Islamā€ (cited in Lal [c] p 538) (Can we learn anything from this)

Despite their supposed ā€˜dhimmiā€™ status, mass slaughter, mass forced conversion and mass enslavement with the resulting forced conversion to Islam were practised throughout Islamic rule and into the 20th century as many demanded the idolaters/polytheists convert or die. Hindu fighters and males were slaughtered with women and children enslaved.

Eunuch slavery was practised on young boys. Often actual numbers arenā€™t given, just comments like ā€˜countless captives/slaves,ā€™ or ā€˜all the women and children were taken.ā€™ Where numbers are recorded, they are terrifying. Along with people, the Muslims took everything they couldā€”coins, jewels, cloths, clothes, furniture, idols, animals, grain etc or destroyed it.

Muslim rulers were foreigners. Until the 13th century, most slaves were sent out of India but following the Sultanate of Delhi (1206) they were retained to work for the sultanate, sold in India or sent elsewhere. Slaves from elsewhere were imported and Muslim armies were composed of a wide array of foreign slave groups ā€˜convertedā€™ to Islam and ā€˜Hindusā€™ and Indian ā€˜converts.ā€™

Slaves were the promised booty from Allah and obtaining them was a strong motivation for jihad. ā€œslaves were so plentiful that they became very cheap; menā€¦were degradedā€¦.but this is the goodness of Allah, who bestows honours on his own religion and degrades infidelityā€.

(Muslim chronicler Utbi on Sultan Subuktigin of Ghazniā€™s slave raid [942-997] in Sookdheo p166) In Sindh (first area attacked successfully) the early ā€˜Muslimā€™ community was composed mainly of slaves forced into Islam and a small number of Arab masters (Khan p 299). Initially slaves were forced out of India eg Qasim (Arab), the conquerer of Sindh sent by Hajjaj bin Yusuf Sakifi in the caliphate of Walid I, took 300,000 from a 3 year campaign in 712-715 (Khan p 299, Trifkovic p 109).

Muslim fighters came from everywhere to partake in this ā€˜jihad.ā€™ Qasim was suddenly recalled and executed (possibly by being sown in an animalā€™s hide) for supposedly violating 2 Sindhi princesses destined for the caliphā€™s harem!! (Lal [c] p 439) The Ghaznivids-Turks from Ghazni, Afghanistan (997-1206) who subdued the Punjab.

From 17 raids (997-1030) Sultan Muhmud Ghazni (Turk from Afghanistan, 997-1030) sent hundreds of thousands of slaves to Ghanzi (Afghanistan) resulting in a loss of about 2 million people via slaughter or enslavement and sale outside India (Khan p 315). Chroniclers (eg Utbi, the sultanā€™s secretary) provide some numbers eg -from Thanesar, the Muslim army brought 200,000 captives back to Ghazni (Afghanistan).

In 1019, 53,000 were taken. At one time the caliphā€™s 1/5th share was 150,000 suggesting 750,000 captives. 500,000 were taken in one campaign (at Waihind)(Lal [c] p 551) Mahmudā€™s secretary al-Utbi records: ā€œSwords flashed like lightening amid the blackness of clouds, and fountains of blood flowed like the fall of setting star.

The friends of god defeated their opponentsā€¦.the Musalmans wreaked their vengeance on the infidel enemies of god killing 15,000 of themā€¦making them food of the beasts and birds of preyā€¦.god also bestowed on his friends such an amount of booty as was beyond all bounds and calculations, including 500,000 slaves beautiful men and womenā€ (Khan p 191)

The Ghaznividā€™s ruled in the ā€˜Islamic sultanate of the Punjabā€™ till 1186. Attacks in Kashmir, Hansi, and districts of the Punjab resulted in mass slaughter and enslavement eg 100,000 in a 1079 attack in the Punjab (Tarik ā€“i-Alfi in Khan p 276-7, Lal [d] p 553 Under the Ghaurivid rulers (Turks) eg Muhammad Ghauri (Afghani) and his military commander then ruler, Qutbuddin Aibak (r1206-1210), the Delhi sultanate was set up.

Mass beheadings, enslavements, forced conversions, plunder and the destruction of temples continued. Slaves were incredibly plentiful. In 1195, Aibak took 20,000 slaves from Raja Bhim and 50,000 at Kalinjar (1202) (Lal [c] p 536). ā€œeven the poor (Muslim) householder became owner of numerous slaves.ā€™ (Khan 103, Lal [c] p 537).

Through the 13/14th century ruled by the Khilji (Khaljis) and Tughlaqā€™s, slavery grew as Islam spread. Thousands of slaves were sold at a low price everyday (Khan p 280). Alauddin Khiljiā€™s (r 1296-1316) capture of slaves was stupendous and he shackled, chained and humiliated slaves (Lal [c] p 540).

In the sack of Somnath alone he: ā€œtook captive a great number of handsome and elegant maidens, amounting to 20,000 and children of both sexes ..more than the pen can enumerate. The Mohammadan army brought the country to utter ruin, destroyed the lives of inhabitants, and plundered the cities and captured their offspring.ā€ (historian cited in Bostom p 641, Lal [c] p 540)

Many thousands were massacred. Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) had 50,000 slave BOYS in his personal service and 70,000 slaves worked continuously on his buildings.(Lal [c] p 541) Women practised Jauhar (burning or killing oneself to avoid enslavement and rape) and sati. The Sufi Amir Khusrau notes ā€œthe Turks, whenever they please, can seize, buy or sell any Hinduā€ (Lal [c] p 541)

Enslaved and Castrated Eunuchs: All over the Islamic world, the conquered were castrated, including in India. This was done so men could guard harems, provide carnal indulgence for rulers, give devotion to the ruler as they had no hope of a family of their own and of course, this quickly reduced the breeding stock of the conquered.

Castration was a common practice throughout Muslim rule possibly contributing to the DECLINE in Indiaā€™s population from 200 million in 1000 CE to 170 million in 1500 CE (Khan p 314) Once Sultan Bakhtiyar Khilji conquered Bengal in 1205, it became a leading supplier of castrated slaves. This remained the case into the Mogul period (1526-1857).

Akbar the Great (1556-1605) owned eunuchs. Said Khan Chaghtai owned 1,200 eunuchs (an official of Akbarā€™s son Jahangir)! In Aurangzebā€™s reign, in 1659 at Golkunda (Hyderabad), 22,000 boys were emasculated and given to Muslim rulers and governors or sold. (Khan 313).

Sultan Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) had 50,000 boys in his personal service; Sultan Muhammad Tughlaq (r 1325-51) had 20,000 and Sultan Firoz Tughlaq (r 1351-1388) had 40,000 (Firoz Tulghlaq liked to collect boys in any way and had 180,000 slaves in total (Lal [c] p 542). Several commanders under various sultans were eunuchs.

Muslim historians record the ā€˜infatuationā€™ of sultans Mahmud Ghazni, Qutbuddin Aibak, and Sikandar Lodi ā€“for handsome young boys! Sultan Mahmud was infatuated by his Hindu commander Tilak (Khan p 314) ~ The Muslim Issue, August 31, 2015


posted by Major D Swami (Retired) @ 5:17 PM  
Post a Comment
<< Home

Previous Post
Indian Soldiers
World War 1
Links To Rangers
Military Related Links

End of a Saracen
East Malaysian
Blow Pipe
Lieutenant Colonel
Zulkapli Abdul Rahman
Click Here
Lieutenant Colonel
Harbhajan Singh
Click Here
Heads from the Land
of the Head Hunters
20 Harrowing Images
Vietnam War

Creme De La Creme-Click here

Killing Time
Before Deployment

Lt Col Idris Hassan
Royal Malay
Click Here

Also Known as
General Half Track

Dayak Warrior
Iban Tracker with
British Soldier

Showing the
British Trooper
what a jackfruit is!!

Iban Tracker

A British Trooper training
an Iban Tracker

Iban Tracker

Tracker explaining
to the British Soldier who
knows little about tracking

Iban Tracker
Explaining to the
British Trooper the meaning
of the marks on the leaf

Iban Tracker
Aussie admiring
Tracker's Tattoos

Lest We Forget Major Sabdin Ghani
Click Here
Captain Mohana Chandran
al Velayuthan (200402) SP
Ranger Bajau
ak Ladi PGB
Cpl Osman PGB

Powered by

Free Blogger Templates

BLOGGER, pub-8423681730090065, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0 <bgsound src="">, pub-8423681730090065, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0