Rudyard Kipling"
āWhen you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldierā
General Douglas MacArthur"
āWe are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.ā
āIt is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.ā āOld soldiers never die; they just fade away.
āThe soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.ā
āMay God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .ā āThe object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
āNobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
āIt is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
Cowardly deportation of Syed Fawad By Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Monday, April 17, 2023
Malaysiakini : In an interview with Voice of America since his arrest, incarceration and torture, Syed Fawad (above)
not only describes his harrowing journey back to Pakistan but also that
he was told by Malaysian immigration operatives that āā¦the Pakistani
intelligence agencies demand us to give you back to Pakistanā.
Malaysia
had told the world that the reason why they deported Syed Fawad was
that he was supposedly a police officer who was wanted for disciplinary
action.
At the very least, the Malaysian government should get its lies - Iām sorry ācover storyā - correct.
Now
Saifuddin is claiming that Syed Fawad did not have a valid entry pass.
Previously the minister had admitted that a deal was made with former
prime minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob.
As reported in
the press - "This request was done through the previous government
(under former prime minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob), not the current one. I
can confirm that based on official records, the action taken (to
deport) was done according to the Pakistani government's request for
Syed Fawad. We located him and deported him. That's the procedure."
So
let me be very clear. When Syed Fawadās wife was desperately pleading
for Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to help locate her husband, what this
government had done was carry water for the previous administration.
We
can either assume that the Malaysian government, its intelligence
services and its diplomatic corps, are the most ignorant in the region
when it comes to the tradecraft of Pakistani intelligence and the way
how they treat people they term enemies of the state or what the
government, under Ismail Sabri and now defended by Anwar, had done was
to send a journalist back to his home country to be tortured and
possibly killed, knowing full well that this would be a possible
outcome.
This is why when Waytha says this - "The government
should have used the treaty and its legal provisions in treating Syed
Fawad. That would have given Syed Fawad an avenue to be legally
represented and ventilate his case in a court of law that his stay in
Malaysia was legal under international laws and his recognised status
under the Geneva Refugee Convention" - it is even more of an indictment
against Anwarās government, rather than Ismail Sabriās.
And here
is the thing, if all this was kosher, why the need for secrecy? Why the
need for these contradictory statements from the government? Why the
need for Malaysia to appear like a complete buffoon with various
international journalistsā advocacy groups?
To understand how duplicitous the Pakistani government has been, all we need to refer to is this article by the Committee to Protect Journalists.
The
report states: āThe first information report in that case, which opened
the investigation, accuses Shah of disseminating āfalse, frivolous and
fakeā information about Pakistani civil servants, including Interior
Ministry official Naqeeb Arshad, through a Malaysian WhatsApp account
and unspecified posts on the Twitter account Bureaucracy, according to
CPJās review of the report.
āThe Bureaucracy account, which has
around 3,200 followers and covers politics and alleged corruption in
Pakistan, posted allegations in January 2022 that Arshad had solicited
bribes in exchange for visa extensions. CPJ called Arshadās office and
emailed the Interior Ministry for comment, but did not receive any
replies.ā
Functional judiciary
According to Saifuddin,
from Pakistan's āofficial records,ā Syed Fawad is a police officer and
not a journalist, which again demonstrates what kind of bureaucrats we
have in Malaysia Madani.
The
fact is that what this journalist was doing here was not only
highlighting alleged corruption in his country Pakistan but was also
writing about the refugee experience here in Malaysia. This of course is
something we cannot have.
Remember someone like Dr Zakir Naik is
welcomed with open arms but a journalist like Syed Fawad is just another
victim of the way how successive Malaysian governments operate. But
really, can we expect anything else from Pakatan Harapan, BN or PN when
it comes to human rights issues?
Remember when Harapan deported
Turkish asylum seeker Arif Komis, who was critical of the Erdogan
regime and the old maverick was sceptical that the Turkish government
would torture him despite overwhelming evidence by various agencies
worldwide of Turkeyās brutal methods of suppression?
Or how about
when Harapan deported four Egyptians to face possible death and torture?
Latheefa Koya, who was the Lawyers for Liberty executive director, said
at the time: āThis has been done secretly, flouting international human
rights standards. We would have expected this inhumane conduct on the
part of the (previous) BN regime, but itās outrageous that the Pakatan
Harapan government is doing the same thing."
The PDRM investigated
Arif and concluded that he should not be in this country. Meanwhile,
Zakir is busy suing politicians in this country ā politicians from the
ruling coalition.
While Zakir has been banned from making public
speeches because he makes racist statements, he is defended by not only
the ruling coalition but also by far-right personalities who use him
(and are used by him) to propagate anti-Malaysian ideas.
Meanwhile,
a journalist like Syed Fawad is deported ā and many others like him -
while a government, headed by reformer Anwar, makes all these excuses.
People, especially apologists for Madaniville, like to minimise this
issue and claim that there are more important issues to handle.
They
are misguided for a couple of reasons. The first is that if the ruling
regime can callously disregard the rights of someone seeking shelter in
this land at the behest of tyrannical regimes, then nobody in Malaysia
is safe.
Human rights, unfortunately, is a zero-sum game. What we
have learnt after decades of institutional malfeasances is that the
regime always attacks long-hanging fruit which they know will not gain
any traction from people who demand accountability and competent
governance.
Secondly, people talk about having a functional
judiciary and the only way to have a functional judiciary is if it is
constantly tested with hard cases like this.
What a functional
judiciary does is curtail, within the limits of the law, the excesses of
power while disregarding political expediency.
It is abundantly
clear that in either Keluarga Malaysia or Malaysia Madani, people who
expose corruption or dissent in oppressive regimes are not welcome.