Rudyard Kipling"
āWhen you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldierā
General Douglas MacArthur"
āWe are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.ā
āIt is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.ā āOld soldiers never die; they just fade away.
āThe soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.ā
āMay God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .ā āThe object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
āNobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
āIt is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
The Anwar and Zahid show By Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Thursday, April 06, 2023
Malaysiakini : Both need each other in a way that sustains the Malay political
establishment, which is currently threatened by the rise of the
religio-fascist alliance headed by PAS.
Dennis is right when he
says Anwar talks about good governance, accountability, and the
importance of political stability, but hereās the thing, Anwar is
extremely good at talking and extremely hesitant in translating that
into deeds.
This coalition government does not have a solid base.
The only party which has a solid, reliable base is DAP and this has been
vitally important in maintaining not only the wobbly democratic guard
rails but also the countryās economy. However, it also means the fascist
alliance has a good talking point when spooking the Malays.
I
would argue that Anwarās good governance talk is for the Pakatan Harapan
base which someone like Zahid does not have to cater to.
What Zahid has to demonstrate, to the Malay base, is the political
and institutional privileges that voting for Umno will bring but more
importantly establish himself and his coterie as holding Umno together.
Anwar
knows he needs the Malay vote which means he needs someone who knows
how to play the race card, in a way he is hampered by doing because he
needs to protect his multiracial bona fides.
Zahidās moves
Zahid
does not have this problem and indeed by allowing Umno to take the lead
in the Malay heartland, Anwar believes this would get him the kind of
legitimacy that is required in the ketuanan (supremacist) game.
People assume saudara
(brother) Anwar is ignorant of the moves Zahid is making to sustain
power in Umno. But is he ignorant of those moves? Zahid could not make
these plays without the support of the federal bureaucracy and the
backing of power brokers within Harapan.
Sure, they may not know the exact details of the schemes but it is enough that support is given when needed.
Do
not for one minute believe those protestations from Pakatan Harapan
political operatives that they did not know what was going on if the
manure hits the fan.
It is like Captain Renault in āCasablancaā
going, āIām shocked! Shocked to find that gambling is going on in hereā -
while a croupier hands him a pile of money. This is establishment
politics after all.
All these appointments Zahid is making to strategic posts within and outside the government, all those moves sanctioned by Harapan may seem like a fait accompli,
but look closer and all these positions in some way are connected to
not only the mid-level echelons of the bureaucracy (which have vast
influence) but which also service grassroots level proxies in various
states.
These are signals not only picked up by those in the
bureaucracy who could aid Anwar and Zahid but also picked up on by
Perikatan Nasional, which is why there are going ape manure. They
understand the system is being manipulated and they want to be the ones
doing the manipulating.
What did former US president Barack Obama
say - āI learned to respect the nuts and bolts of politics, the
attention to detail required, the daily grind that might prove the
difference between winning and losing. It confirmed, too, what I already
knew about myself: that whatever preferences I had for fair play, I
didnāt like to lose.ā
And let us not forget the royal institution. PN has made it very clear what they think of this sacred cow of Malay politics.
Everyone from former prime minister Muhyddin Yassin to PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang has thumbed their nose
at the institution and the royals understand that with PN at the helm,
the delicate ecosystem of patronage and supremacy would be subverted.
That is the thing with a theocracy, the clerics are in charge.
They need each other
The
relationship between Anwar and Zahid goes way back. It is pointless
rehashing all the political rumours and matters of public record which
illustrate the kind of alliance these two men had.
Suffice it to
say, both understand that at this point in their political careers, they
both need each other to remain relevant but also to present divergent
interests because it satisfies different voting blocs.
Zahid as a
DPM gambit only pays off if he can maintain control of Umno, and more
importantly, supports the initiatives to correct the electoral
imbalances that favour religious extremism in this country. So far, I
have seen very little talk about this from Harapan but plenty of it,
mostly fear-mongering from PN.
The
credibility of the government is not an issue because credibility was
never a vote-getter in this compromised electoral system.
Maybe
when BN was getting the lionās share of the vote, one could make the
argument that the government of the day was credible in the sense of
vote share but since everything is based on the ketuanan system, credibility as some sort of political qualifier is overrated.
The
best Malaysians who do not want a theocratic state can hope for is that
by dismantling certain foundational elements of the Malay
establishment, like monopolies and institutional fiefdoms, Harapan,
perhaps for self-serving reasons, is keeping the theocratic state at
bay.
And yes, if through corruption charges, certain personalities
are brought down by their decades-long pecuniary malfeasances, so much
the better. You canāt make the argument that this is vengeance politics
merely because your hand is cut off from the public cookie jar.
Indeed,
going after monopolies and if Anwar is serious about this, is perhaps
the area where Zahid and Anwar may clash. This is all part of the
feudalistic mindset that Umno created over the years and the reason some
folks, certainly in PN, are getting flustered.
PN wanted to
inherit the system and Zahid may encounter resistance from Umno
personalities and their proxies who are dependent on this system. It
remains to be seen how serious Anwar is in carrying out this part of his
agenda.
And this is exactly why the old maverick is also flustered. He does not have the power to protect his factotums like he used to.
As
always, the enemy is not only outside but also within. Can the federal
government curtail the agenda of the deep Islamic state which is making
very public moves now, or will the government enable them?
The big question is, will the Anwar and Zahid show forestall a theocratic takeover or would it pave the way to one?