Rudyard Kipling"
āWhen you're left wounded on Afganistan's plains and
the women come out to cut up what remains, Just roll to your rifle
and blow out your brains,
And go to your God like a soldierā
General Douglas MacArthur"
āWe are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.ā
āIt is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.ā āOld soldiers never die; they just fade away.
āThe soldier, above all other people, prays for peace, for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.ā
āMay God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .ā āThe object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.
āNobody ever defended, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.
āIt is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
The Soldier stood and faced God
Which must always come to pass
He hoped his shoes were shining
Just as bright as his brass
"Step forward you Soldier,
How shall I deal with you?
Have you always turned the other cheek?
To My Church have you been true?"
"No, Lord, I guess I ain't
Because those of us who carry guns
Can't always be a saint."
I've had to work on Sundays
And at times my talk was tough,
And sometimes I've been violent,
Because the world is awfully rough.
But, I never took a penny
That wasn't mine to keep.
Though I worked a lot of overtime
When the bills got just too steep,
The Soldier squared his shoulders and said
And I never passed a cry for help
Though at times I shook with fear,
And sometimes, God forgive me,
I've wept unmanly tears.
I know I don't deserve a place
Among the people here.
They never wanted me around
Except to calm their fears.
If you've a place for me here,
Lord, It needn't be so grand,
I never expected or had too much,
But if you don't, I'll understand."
There was silence all around the throne
Where the saints had often trod
As the Soldier waited quietly,
For the judgment of his God.
"Step forward now, you Soldier,
You've borne your burden well.
Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,
You've done your time in Hell."
Apparently, Penang mufti did not get the memo - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Thursday, June 09, 2022
Malaysiakini : Firstly, when Wan Salim says something is āabsurdā in Islam, he means
the Islam that he propagates. Obviously, there are other schools of
thought in Islam that he refers to but he dismisses them as ādeviantā.
Secondly,
insulting the beliefs of other religions is going against the
foundational ideas of Islam as enunciated by Minister in Prime
Ministerās Department Idris Ahmad.
Of
course, nobody in their right mind, especially if you are a non-Muslim
in this country, will take anything these religious operatives say
seriously because it could be empirically proven that state actors
routinely insult the religions of the non-Muslims and there are no
sanctions from the state.
When it comes to the Bon Odori festival, the Penang mufti is just aping what Idris said about advising Muslims to stay away
from the festival because a study conducted by the Malaysian Islamic
Development Department (Jakim) found that the festival does have
religious elements.
So by advising Muslims to stay away from such
events, the religious bureaucracy in this country is essentially
implying that all these festivals and events are ādeviantā.
In other words, the state is essentially insulting different cultures and religions.
And all this is targeted at the majority in this country. You have to ask yourself why?
What
we are really talking about is some deep level programming for
political purposes. For instance, the Penang mufti is afraid that the
Ben Odori festival would lead to polytheism. Why is that such a bad thing?
Essentially
polytheism is merely different avenues of worshipping the divine. It
also encourages a belief system which is not dependent on one single
interpretation and of course, religious gatekeepers.
So essentially what we are dealing with is diversity.
Malay political establishment
All
religions have commonalities. Those positive commonalities make it
possible for people of diverse religious faiths to play well with
others.
Call it evolutionary or spiritual but the result is the
same, the receding of religious dogma and the acceptance of the
plurality of thought. All diverse cohesive societies exhibit this.
In
a political context, what does this mean? Well, it means that a polity
would be open to various forms of political expressions ā ideologies ā
but more importantly, various political parties to express their will at
the ballot box.
Social engineering, the influx of foreigners and
decades of the Arabisation process had made it clear that mainstream
Malay culture and traditions are in fact a replica of Saudi culture or
at least that is the eventual goal.
āMalayā tradition and cultural
norms have over the years been replaced with Wahhabi imperatives that
seek to extinguish the various cultural influences that made Malay
culture and traditions such a melting pot of Southeast Asian influences.
This is why the Malay political establishment has always been terrified of a plurality of voices in the majority polity.
This
is why the Malay political operatives are operating under certain
conditions when it comes to race and religion which hampers any
progressive policies because, be it establishment or opposition, these
operatives have to kowtow to the imperatives of the religious
bureaucracy whose sole aim is to make the majority polity to vote
against their interests.
Yes, I know, that is a bold claim. Again,
there is enough evidence to demonstrate that the policies of the Malay
political establishment have been detrimental to all Malaysians but
specifically to the dominant majority polity.
This is why the religious bureaucracy aided by the state security apparatus is obsessed with ādeviantā behaviour.
Anything
that would encourage diversity in the majority polity is sanctioned by
the state. And look at the kind of ādeviantsā that the state targets.
Someone like Wan Ji Wan Hussin who said this:
āI donāt agree that only Islam can be propagated. The Federal
Constitution states that, but I don't agree with it from the viewpoint
of religion. Let the law practitioners debate if itās from the lawās
point of view.
āBut as someone who studied religion, that
statement is wrong. Non-Muslims should be given the right to give their
views, as opposed to only the Muslims who can do so. Maybe that's why
people have accused me of being āliberalā.ā
And you can add
Sisters in Islam to the list. Or someone like Siti Kasim and numerous
Muslim scholars, activists and intellectuals.
Their crimes? Well,
essentially what they are arguing against is fascism and solidarity with
their Malaysian brothers and sisters.
If you want to know what I
think is deviant, it is that our tax ringgit funds these folk and also
defends teachers who make rape jokes.