The Muslim leader has skillfully made
this demand just before the Uttar Pradesh State elections, to polarize
the electorate.
Waqar asserts that other political parties, such as the secular
Congress and the socialist Samajwadi Party, must put forward their views
on this issue. Waqar has expressed disappointment in politicians who
approach the Muslims for votes but grow apprehensive when Muslims demand
a Muslim Deputy CM. He complained
that the Muslims were not given the promised 12% representation in
2012, and proclaimed, “We will definitely snatch away the Deputy CM post
from them. You will have to make a Muslim the deputy CM of the state.”
He also claimed that it’s only a matter of time before political parties
agree to give the Deputy CM position to the Muslims. That this
democratic post should be reserved for Muslims only is a fanciful idea
that abolishes the very principles of democracy and secularism on which
India is predicated.
Anyhow, what we must ponder is this: why is it that after 70 years of
independence, a Muslim politician wants a special privilege for Muslims
in a democratic state? It is not because India has denied them
participation in the federal structure.
The Islamic rule in India that lasted for several centuries was
marked by large-scale religious conversions and orchestrated mass
massacres. When the British decided to leave, the man who became the
founder of Pakistan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, demanded an Islamic country
for his people, and his demand was met. Unlike the Hindus, who were
forced to leave the Islamic provinces of Pakistan and East Pakistan
(present-day Bangladesh), a large number of Muslims chose not to
relocate to Pakistan, and stayed back in India with assurances of safety
and equality extended by the leaders who were leading the country at
that time.
Muslims in India, from the genesis of its democracy, were appointed
to key positions in the government. India’s first-ever Education
Minister was Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, who was born in Makkah. He was
home-schooled and self-taught. The Indian education system doesn’t
recognize these concepts, but cordially extended the education ministry
to a Maulana whose proficiency was in Islamic studies, the Quran, the
Hadith, and Sharia. He had also learned other contemporary subjects from
tutors hired by his parents. This should explain why the Islamic
invasion in India has been glorified in school textbooks and invaders
been introduced as great emperors.
Eminent Muslim personalities have been voted into the highest office
of India, that is, the President’s office, multiple times; Zakir
Hussain, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, and A. P. J. Abdul Kalam have served as
President, and Mohammad Hidayatullah served as acting President for a
limited time as well.
Despite Muslims being honored with the title of the First Citizen of
India, several political leaders from the community have repeatedly
played the victim card. After enjoying two consecutive terms in the
capacity of India’s Vice President, Mohammad Hamid Ansari went on record
lamenting that Muslims were being victimized in the country, and that
there was a feeling of unease and a sense of insecurity growing among
them. When challenged on a televised interview and requested to
substantiate his claim, Hamid Ansari grew angry.
Muslims have had ample representation in state-level politics in
India as well. Firhad Hakim, despite receiving a great deal of criticism
for allegedly referring to a Muslim-dominated area in Kolkata as “Mini Pakistan,”
became mayor of that city in West Bengal. In March 2021, this title was
passed on to Khaled Ahmed. After the minority-pandering All India
Trinamool Congress (TMC) won the recent elections, several Muslims were
included in the cabinet. There are 32 Muslim Members of the Legislative
Assembly in Communist-ruled Kerala, and the newly-elected Tamil Nadu
government has adequate representation from the Muslim community as
well.
Then what is it that triggers Syed Asim Waqar to demand a default
Muslim in the significant position of Deputy CM? Is he trying to work
toward Islamic rule in India indirectly by seating Muslims in key
positions regardless of their fitness? Is it a jihad through the ranks? A
“Ghazwa-e-Hind” of sorts? Waqar hails from the Islamic political party
whose leader, Akbaruddin Owaisi, made this communally-charged and
highly-condemned statement: “If police are removed for 15 minutes, we
(Muslims) will finish 100 crore Hindus,” not once but twice.
Given that the Indian police bows to the respective state
governments, how sensible would it be to have a constitutional office
reserved solely for a Muslim, with the merit of the minister in question
notwithstanding? The unreasonable demands of politicians such as Waqar
never end; the more you serve them, the more they crave. This is not
unique to the Indian polity. This is a universal trait.
Unfortunately,
no first-world country is intellectually equipped to put an end to these
perpetual demands.