Both had children from their previous marriages, and had been living
together for the past few years near the Anchal region of Kollam,
Kerala. Aathira was fond of spending time on social media and often
posted videos on Tiktok or Instagram. Shanawas did not approve of this
habit of Aathira, and voiced his opposition regularly, which often
sparked quarrels between the two.
On June 9, Shanawas was again enraged by a recent video Aathira had
uploaded on the video-sharing platforms, which led to a severe squabble
in the house.
At around 7 pm, their neighbours rushed to the house upon hearing the
spine-chilling screams of the 28-year-old, and were terrified after
witnessing Aathira, engulfed in flames, trying to run away from
Shanavas. They put out the fire, informed local police and hurried her
to the Taluk hospital, but her severe burns demanded special treatment.
She was transferred to the Thiruvananthapuram Medical College and
admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, but soon succumbed to her injuries.
As per reports, Shanawas tried to self-immolate as well and suffered
burns over 40% of his body, but he survived, and has been taken into
police custody. Police have filed murder charges against him.
Now this is not one isolated case of a Muslim partner becoming
angered over a Hindu partnerās social media activities and taking her
life. Back in January 2020, 25-year-old Ayaj Ahmad, a delivery boy
employed with an online food delivery company, bludgeoned his
22-year-old wife Reshma Manglani to death after being suspicious due to
her Facebook usage. The couple had met at work, eloped, married some two
years ago and had a 3-months-old baby.
The young wife spent ātoo much timeā on Facebook and had gathered
some 6000 followers on the site. This triggered suspicion in Ahmadās
mind about Reshma having an affair, which led to frequent fights, due to
which Reshma had returned to her parents.
On the night of the incident, Ahmad went to Reshmaās parentās home on
the pretext of sorting things out and convinced her to reconcile with
him. The couple then went on a ride together on the husbandās
two-wheeler. He stopped in a deserted area, strangled her to death and
crushed her face with a rock to keep her from being identified. But he
was nevertheless soon arrested by the local police on charges of murder.
While modernists, liberals and leftists try to normalize interfaith
marriages in the Indian subcontinent, especially when those of a Muslim
man marrying and a Hindu woman, they become dreadfully silent about the
catastrophic outcomes of some of these marriages, which, in most cases
are not very pleasant. Young Hindu girls being killed for refusing
romantic advances by men from the Muslim community is almost everyday
news in India. Yet feminists who canāt emphasize womenās rights enough,
do not say a word about a womanās right to say āNoā when the perpetrator
who killed a woman as a reaction to her āNoā is a Muslim.
Some Hindu women who have married Muslim men have reportedly been
slaughtered, sliced to pieces, packed up in suitcases and abandoned.
Many were pressured to sleep with the male relatives in the family on a
routine basis. Refusal could lead to violence, assault and rape.
The culture clash between Islamic attitudes and those of other
religions that are more tolerant of societal changes is real. For how
long are we going to avoid addressing this issue? The ākaffirā woman is
not as submissive to her man, as a Shanawas or Ahmad would want her to
be. The āinfidelā woman was not raised with the conditioning that she
will have to keep herself covered head to toe in one dull color, or that
she will have to obey the man and respond to every word he utters with
absolute submission. Hence when the newness of the romance fades, many
women find themselves trapped in a difficult and dangerous reality.
In other news, a Hindu woman Sajitha, missing for 11 years, was
rescued from her Muslim neighborās house just 500 meters from her own in
Palakkad, Kerala. She was 18 years old when she went missing, and had
spent the past decade in a single room with Alinchuvattil Rahman, with
no phone available. Rahmanās parents also shared the house, but they
claimed that they had no idea of Sujitha presence in the house, as that
room was always locked. When interrogated, Sujitha stated that she was
in love with Rahman and wanted to continue living with him.
Her long
isolation suggested otherwise, and gave the impression that she may have
come to sympathize with her captor.