So if the DAP is really the power behind the Harapan throne and everyone else in Harapan is just slavishly obeying the DAP, then perhaps Utusan should ask the DAP to bail them out. After all, Malay politicians being beholden to the DAP is an Utusan Malaysia talking point, an Umno talking point, a PAS talking point, an Isma talking point, even a talking point for Dr Zakir Naik.

The paper now says that it is sorry for its one-sided reporting. Mind you, I could care less if Utusan’s reporting is one-sided. In "So what if Utusan is anti-DAP?" I argued that Utusan’s claim that Malaysiakini is pro-DAP is about as useful as not acknowledging that Utusan is anti-DAP. By this, I mean that Utusan and Malaysiakini both have their biases, which are ultimately irrelevant so long as the state does not favour one over the other. Since the state does favour Utusan, this leaves Malaysiakini as one of the few 'independent' – even if allegedly pro-opposition – media outlets in the country.

Utusan, at one time, was upset because Malaysiakini was not sanctioned for "wild and slanderous" readers comments. I get that Utusan would be upset by comments made by columnists and journalists, but to get upset about readers' comments is the kind of horse manure that would be pushed by their one time masters in a bid to silence dissent, and ironically even considered by a member of the Harapan government What pisses me off is, when Utusan went after someone like lawyer Rosli Dahlan and had to apologise for its slanderous coverage:

“We hereby again, upon request and with the consent and express agreement of lawyer Rosli Dahlan, repeat the contents of the said public apology referred to above and hereby again unconditionally and unreservedly apologise to lawyer Rosli Dahlan for our said untruthful article and we regret the damage that we have caused to him." The attacks against Malaysians - is a "crime" that cannot be just dismissed as partisan politics.

"We hope our political differences can be put aside. The mentality of newspapers produced by the company has changed for our survival," claimed the recent open letter, which basically means now that Umno has screwed us, we need a new sugar daddy for which we can do some dirty work.

So why doesn’t Utsuan start giving the DAP some positive coverage? A freebie, if you like, until something long term can be worked out. After all, Utusan editors are on record – during a BTN sponsored event – that their role was to spin and lie for the government and that this took money. Unlike many people who do not bother reading Utusan, I pay attention to the propaganda coming out of the paper.

It was interesting reading comments from everyone, from the MCA to Kua Kia Soong, who they quoted at length, but conveniently left out the context of their criticisms and the overall big picture politics of someone like Kua. It was – is – fun reading how Utusan always claimed that an outfit like Malaysiakini was out to disrupt the peace and stability of the country, while engaging in the behaviour they accused Malaysiakini of. Utusan claims that like a piece of coal, they could turn into a diamond.

Well, you turn coal into a diamond with pressure. So, what kind of pressure should be applied to turn Utusan into a polished diamond? I mean, when you get down to it, it is not a radical shift in identity politics for Utusan to become a Harapan propaganda organ, right?

We know Utusan will always spin, lie and slander for their political masters. Would this be something Harapan would be interested in? What do you think the reaction of their readers would be when they suddenly see glowing articles about how the DAP is not the power behind the throne, Malays rights are not in jeopardy, or that Christianity proselytisation is actually a myth?

Maybe Utusan thinks that it could be a house organ for the Malay politicians in Harapan. A kind of pressure group which could express things that Malay politicians cannot say? I suppose this works, but this would mean that the remaining Utusan readership is not really about ideology.