too, there are those whose views may surprise you. According to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak told a visiting delegation of European foreign ministers that Hamas āmust not be allowed to emerge from the fighting with the upper hand.ā Karam Jaber, editor of the Egyptian weekly Roz Al-Youssef, blamed Hamas for inflicting ādeath and destruction on the Palestinians. . . . We hope the Hamas leaders will realize that they are fighting a destructive war on behalf of the Iranians and Syrians.ā
And Muhammad Dahlan, a member of the Palestinian Legislative Council and of Fatah's Revolutionary Council, told the Arabic language newspaper al-Hayat that Hamas has sacrificed āthe Palestinian cause for the illusion of an Islamic emirate in Gaza.ā
By stark contrast, an army of American and European commentators have been treating Hamas with kid gloves while bitterly criticizing Israel. Reuters, the international wire service, relentlessly editorializesāin what are ostensibly news storiesāagainst what it terms āIsraeli aggression against Palestinians.ā Reuters characterizes pretty much anyone who is against Israelāno matter how extreme their viewsāas āin support of the people of Gaza.ā
Others make the case for moral equivalence between Hamas and Israel, or charge that Israelās response to Hamasās attacks has been ādisproportionate.ā On CNN the other day, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg offered an apt analogy: If you call the police to report an intruder in your home, do you want only a single officer dispatchedābecause that would be āproportionate?ā Or would you rather enough cops arrive to ensure your safety?
By that measure, Israelās response has been not disproportionate but inadequateāas demonstrated by the fact that the missiles keep on coming.
Time magazineās most recent cover story argues that no matter what Israel does militarily it ācanāt win.ā Time proposes that Israelis stop fighting and return to the borders they had in 1967āwhen they were attacked by their Arab neighbors in a war meant to wipe the Jewish state off the map. āOnly then will the Palestinians and the other Arab states agree to a durable peace,ā Time advises. āItās as simple as that.ā
But if it were as simple as that, wouldnāt Israelās withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 have brought something other than a 500 percent increase in missile salvos? Whatās more, from the West Bank, even the smallest missiles could hit Israelās largest cities and international airport. Can you imagine the death toll should those come under daily assault?
Evidently, many pundits and solons cannot. More than a few ordinary Iranians could probably explain it to them.
National Reviewā Clifford D. May, a former New York Times foreign correspondent, is the president of the
Foundation for Defense of Democracies , a policy institute focusing on terrorism.