INN : The Jews of Mandate Palestine were politically
powerless and greatly outnumbered by Arabs throughout the land. The
Mufti of Jerusalem, nominally a religious figure but in fact a
politician and a vicious Jew-hater, continually badgered the British
authorities and incited Arabs against the Jews, for instance by claiming
that Jews putting a temporary gender separation, mechitza, at the Kotel for
Yom Kippur services in 1929 was an assault on the Al Aqsa Mosque and an
attempt by Jews to desecrate it, tear it down and rebuild the Temple.
The Mufti had a long reach and a willing audience and his message
arrived in Hebron, where the small Jewish community had lived in peace
with their Arab neighbors for a long time.
Yet,
there must have been Arab hatred and resentment of Jews festering
beneath the surface calm of Hebron because upon receiving the Muftiās
false message that the Jews were storming Al Aqsa, a mob of thousands of
armed Arabs descended on the small unarmed Jewish community of Hebron,
murdering, maiming stealing and destroying.
Having
trusted their Arab neighbors, only a few of whom tried to help them
(despite the Jews having helped them in many ways through the years,
ed.) and protect them, the Jews of Hebron including the Yeshiva
students, their rabbis, Jewish merchants, and Jewish women and children
were murdered and maimed in gory and grotesque ways. The Arab pogromists
murdered David Shainberg of Memphis, Tennessee that day along with many
others. Schwartz does not spare the details of the butchery and those
details are very reminiscent of October 7.
Although
there were few officials and police available to protect the Jews in
Hebron, most of the policemen were Arabs, some of whom joined in the
pogrom. (Ed. See Rabbi Kook's efforts here.) To
their credit, a few Arabs of Hebron not only refused to join in but
protected Jews at some risk to themselves. Nevertheless, Arab pogromists
killed more Jews in the Hebron Massacre of 1929 than European
pogromists murdered in the more famous Kishineff pogrom of 1903.
From that pogrom Ghosts of a Holy War draws
a straight line, mostly through the person of the Mufti, from the
Hebron Massacre to the weak-kneed response of the British to the two
year campaign of murder and destruction conducted by Arabs in Israel
from 1936-1938 (sometimes called āThe Arab Revoltā) to the Mufti being
expelled from Mandate Palestine just before World War Two and obtaining
refuge in Berlin with his hero, Adolph Hitler, who gave the Mufti the
job of propagandizing the Arab world against the Jews and recruiting
Arab soldiers to fight the Allies.
After
Israeli independence the Arab world seethed with even more hatred for
Jews, made all the worse because the Arabs were unable to defeat Israel
on the battlefield, even with substantial aid from their Soviet
sponsors. By the 1960s the Arab war against the Jews, which after
consultation in Moscow the Arabs decided was a ānational liberation
movement,ā was led by the Muftiās cousinās son, Yasser Arafat, in his
campaign of murder, bombing and kidnapping against Jews.
Schwartz
recounts that Arafat was offered a so-called ātwo state solutionā on
multiple occasions and turned it down rather than recognize the
existence of Israel as a legitimate state.
More
recently Schwarz visited Hebron to find that Hebron is an Arab city
whose mayor is a convicted terrorist-murderer who was released by Israel
in a prisoner swap and whose constituents see his status as terrorist and murderer as a feature not a defect.
She
found that after October 7, the Arab lies about what had happened were
similar to those which had been spread by the Mufti after the Hebron
Massacre. After the Hebron massacre the Mufti had spread the lie that it
was the British who had murdered the Jews of Hebron, or the Jews
murdered themselves in order to cause a wave of sympathy for Zionism, or
that it was the Jews who attacked the Arabs and the Arabs murdered the
Jews in self-defense and that, in any event, it was not nearly as bad as
the Jewish victims and survivors claimed.
Likewise,
after the October 7 massacres across southern Israel, the common
talking points in the Arab world have included that it was not so bad,
not that many Jews were killed, no one was raped, the victims did not
include civilians or women and children but were only soldiers on
military bases and that the Israeli Defense Forces themselves killed
most of the victims.
The Arab
apologists donāt explain why Hamas is still holding Israeli hostages
more than a year later, except to say that October 7 was a legitimate
reaction to Israeli oppression. Even the Arab apologists donāt explain
why, if that is so, something so similar happened on multiple occasions
before Israeli statehood in Jerusalem in 1920, in Hebron and Jerusalem
in 1929 and throughout the 1930s.
No
one wants to say that some Arabs are so soaked in hatred of Jews that
they will commit any atrocity and tell any lie to excuse it.
Shwartz
is clearly ambivalent about the current situation in Israel and
believes that Arabs within Israel ought to have full political and civil
rights and be able to live in peace within Israelās borders and that
Israelis ought to have peace and recognition. She dislikes āsettlersā in
Judea and Samaria who she claims unnecessarily provoke Arabs. She also
dislikes the murder and violence perpetrated by Arabs against Jews. A
sense of human decency permeates her book.
To
her credit, Schwartz has done a good job of telling the story of the
Hebron Massacre and its consequences and showing the connections between
that event almost one hundred years ago and today.
If
there is one failing to this well-researched and well-written book it
is that Schwartz does not inquire deeply into the ideological, social
and cultural factors that could turn Arab farmers and merchants into a
howling, murdering, pillaging mob just on the say-so of one man most of
them had never even seen or heard.
Still, Ghosts of a Holy War is worth the readerās time and attention as a solid history and review of the Arab War against Jewish civilians.