Articles, Opinions & Views: Why isn’t Zakir Naik suing ex-IGP Rahim Noor? - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy

Views & Articles
No Atheists
In A Foxhole
“When you're left wounded on

Afganistan's plains and

the women come out to cut up what remains,

Just roll to your rifle

and blow out your brains,

And go to your God like a soldier”

“We are not retreating. We are advancing in another direction.”

“It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it.”

“Old soldiers never die; they just fade away.

“The soldier, above all other people, prays for peace,

for he must suffer and be the deepest wounds and scars of war.”

“May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't .”
“The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.

“Nobody ever defended anything successfully, there is only attack and attack and attack some more.

“Fixed fortifications are a monument to the stupidity of man."
“It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died.
Rather we should thank God that such men lived.

The Soldier stood and faced God

Which must always come to pass

He hoped his shoes were shining

Just as bright as his brass

"Step forward you Soldier,

How shall I deal with you?

Have you always turned the other cheek?

To My Church have you been true?"

"No, Lord, I guess I ain't

Because those of us who carry guns

Can't always be a saint."

I've had to work on Sundays

And at times my talk was tough,

And sometimes I've been violent,

Because the world is awfully rough.

But, I never took a penny

That wasn't mine to keep.

Though I worked a lot of overtime

When the bills got just too steep,

The Soldier squared his shoulders and said

And I never passed a cry for help

Though at times I shook with fear,

And sometimes, God forgive me,

I've wept unmanly tears.

I know I don't deserve a place

Among the people here.

They never wanted me around

Except to calm their fears.

If you've a place for me here,

Lord, It needn't be so grand,

I never expected or had too much,

But if you don't, I'll understand."

There was silence all around the throne

Where the saints had often trod

As the Soldier waited quietly,

For the judgment of his God.

"Step forward now, you Soldier,

You've borne your burden well.

Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets,

You've done your time in Hell."

& Infor
Malaysian Food
Other Stuff




Why isn’t Zakir Naik suing ex-IGP Rahim Noor? - Commander S THAYAPARAN (Retired) Royal Malaysian Navy
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
Malaysiakini : “Many detained al-Qaeda activists have reportedly told authorities that he had been a huge influence on them. He has been living a self-exiled life in the Middle East after being blamed for "influencing" the Dhaka terror attackers on July 1 this year. His offices and schools have since been raided and sealed.” - The influence of controversial preacher Zakir Naik (BBC).
COMMENT | Zakir Naik is going on a binge suing Indian political operatives. His latest target is former Batu Uban assemblyperson S Raveentharan who apparently posted articles which according to Naik – “imputed that the former is a person of bad character and is a threat to the national security, peace, and harmony of Malaysia.”
If Zakir Naik has the audacity to claim that the articles imputed that he was a threat to national security which is why he is suing, then why not sue the former inspector-general of police Rahim Noor (abovewho said that not only is the evidence against Zakir Naik strong but that Pakatan Harapan should rescind his permanent resident status. “With solid evidence of what he said in Kelantan and what he did in India, I urge the government to revoke Zakir’s PR status and hand him over to the Indian government and let him face the laws there.”
If Zakir Naik is so concerned about his reputation, especially when it comes to imputations that he is a threat to national security, why isn't he concerned that the former top cop has deemed him a threat to national security? After all, Rahim Noor said this: “His recent speeches in Kelantan are bad for national security and the relationship among (the different) races.”
Furthermore, the former IGP also questioned the manner in which Zakir Naik was given his PR status thereby implying that the process was suspect and inferring that Naik is a wanted felon from another country: “How can such a foreigner be granted PR in the blink of an eye? To my knowledge, it’ll take years for someone to be given PR status, despite his or her contribution to the economy or social causes. I also wonder whether proper due diligence and thorough background checks were conducted by the authorities before the PR was approved.“
This is not some random politician but rather the former top cop of the state security apparatus questioning Naik’s status in this country and warning the public that he is a national security threat. And yet, not a peep from this inspiring icon. Why is that? I get that going after Indian political operatives who highlight Naik’s narratives is something which is acceptable in this current climate. After all, the IGP has said numerous times that the “investigation” papers have been sent to the attorney-general but yet the rakyat has not been told what the outcome of the investigations is.
Contrast this with the way how the state persecuted the LTTE 12, and you will get why Zakir is busy suing Indian political personalities all the while painting his detractors as liars and political agitators. I have no idea how these lawsuits can be sustained when some have demonstrated that Naik is a threat to public order. The fact that he has been banned on social media and public speaking is evidence that all these so-called defamatory posts about Zakir Naik have probative value. Now as someone whose views on free speech are a matter of public record, ordinarily I couldn't care less what this man says.
However, I make an exception for Zakir Naik because I think he is a threat to national security and believes that his charges of money-laundering are more than just routine behaviour of some religious operatives. Add to this his advocacy and then denial of terrorist acts, this makes him a useful figure for the dissemination of ideas that suit his agenda.
As for Zakir definition of what a terrorist is, you should refer to my article here. “As (Court of Appeal judge) Gross LJ observes, Dr Naik's explanation that he used the word ‘terrorist’ to support terrorising ‘anti-social elements’ is difficult enough to follow on its own terms, even with time to analyse the written word; this ‘convoluted explanation’ would simply be lost on a ‘live’ audience. “In any event, the notion that for a robber, a policeman is a ‘terrorist’, belongs in the realms of linguistic fantasy. – Gross LJ.”
Keep in mind that Zakir delivers his “speeches” in English hence the only people who may misinterpret what he says are his fans who speak Malay as their first and probably their only language.
Now don’t get me wrong, I am sure there are Malays who understand him and are fluent in English but on the whole, most Malay-speaking adherents rely on interpretations of his speeches from the various local mouthpieces that are part of his entourage.
For instance, when Zakir Naik said that there were passages in the Bible that were pornographic, most of his audience probably have not read the Bible. He further claimed that his religion did not allow him to read “obscene things in front of the audience” even for a million dollars, so he would refrain from quoting those passages. Zakir Naik reassured the audience that he was not there to “degrade” the Bible.
So when Zakir Naik sues anyone for defamation, what he is really doing is suing people for disagreeing with his interpretations. His modus operandi is saying something “offensive” and then claiming that it was not his intention to insult. I’ll end this piece with a stark reminder from another of Zakir Naik's detractors and someone who is the target of Naik's cowardly lawsuits, former ambassador Dennis Ignatious: “What all this says is that the 'Malaysia Baru' that many of us are celebrating is simply a passing phase, a prelude to a more radical religious state. With no leader of consequence willing to defend the secular constitutional foundations of our nation, democracy’s days may well be numbered.
The future, it seems, belongs to the likes of Zakir Naik.”
posted by Major D Swami (Retired) @ 2:24 PM  
Post a Comment
<< Home

Previous Post
Links To Rangers
Military Related Links

Powered by


© Modified on the 12th January 2008 By Articles, Opinions & Views .Template by Isnaini Dot Com
<bgsound src="">